"You're not making an impact if you're not pissing someone off"

Tag Archives: taking our country back

How much confidence does a political Party exude when they only have a bumper sticker slogan for dealing with the complex issues we face as a nation?

The GOP hype that continues to over promise and under delivers

 

As we approach the November elections were are faced with selecting a candidate from one of two Parties that seem more bent on propping up wealthy interests than with promoting an environment that focuses on fundamental fairness for all people.  Clearly the GOP is more cast in this mold than Democrats and this seems evident in their approach in their efforts to win come November.  We seem to hear less touting of their own candidate and his policies than we do of their negative campaigning against President Obama. Their hollow message is summed up in three words and plastered on bumper stickers and websites across this nation – “Anyone But Obama”.

This is a scheme that offers nothing more than a return to the status quo we bled from under George Bush and Republican majorities in the legislative branches.  Restoring political power to a Republican Party that has been hijacked by extremists could easily result in a return, perhaps in spades, to policies that created our worst economic nightmare since the Great Depression nearly 85 years ago.

The extreme view they hold that all government is bad and only free markets can save us from ourselves is one that created the environment that allowed Wall Street to plunder the savings and investments of millions of people and ultimately causing the collapse of the economy.  The GOP and Mitt Romney have no plans to reduce health care costs in this country or any intention of keeping risky speculative financial interests from engaging in ventures that prompted bailouts back in 2008.  What they do have a plan for is to squeeze the middle class and the poor to pay more and more of the taxes that focus more on subsidizing private capital interests, leaving more for their profits to pay themselves and their stockholders.  This is a condition that has steadily increased the income gap in this country over the last 30 years.

Between 1979 and 2007, average after-tax incomes for the top 1 percent rose by 281 percent after adjusting for inflation — an increase in income of $973,100 per household — compared to increases of 25 percent ($11,200 per household) for the middle fifth of households and 16 percent ($2,400 per household) for the bottom fifth

 

Mitt Romney has campaigned on his experience as a businessman, claiming he knows how to create jobs.  Yet this country needs someone with more than mere business experience.  Businesses focus on their bottom line and the interests of a few -  their shareholders.  Many like Romney also hold to the view that trickle down economics, that allows the rich to get richer, will pass on some of this wealth in the form of more jobs, better wages or a combination of both.  Yet those Republicans who have won office lately have killed many pubic sector jobs that contributed to the economy and built up a strong middle class while showing little gains in private sector jobs.

People want to blame the President or praise him when the job reports come in each month but job creation in this country doesn’t rest solely at the feet of the federal government.  How effective have GOP governors and legislatures been in creating sufficient jobs?  Where some states have shown job increases they are too often of the quality that pays lower wages and has fewer benefits than in times past.  Republicans reward so-called job creators by supporting policies that have seen many employers ship their industries to foreign job markets where people work for wages that barely meet subsistence levels for them.

” …one of the two major parties, the Republican Party, has become an insurgent outlier — ideologically extreme; contemptuous of the inherited social and economic policy regime; scornful of compromise; unpersuaded by conventional understanding of facts,evidence, and science; and dismissive of the legitimacy of its political opposition. When one party moves this far from the center of American politics, it is extremely difficult to enact policies responsive to the country’s most pressing challenges.”   - It’s Even Worse Than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided With the New Politics of Extremism, by Thomas E. Mann and Norman J.Ornstein

The GOP has also been more willing to allow wealthy business interests to conceal their tax revenue in off-shore accounts and both Parties continue to create loopholes in our tax system that allow some of the wealthiest people in this country to pay less income tax than wages earners who make under $100,000 annually.  Tax reform may be talked about a lot but where the rubber meets the road there are no signs of tread marks anywhere to be found.  It’s one of those issues that keeps getting kicked down the road.

The Democrats have done their share of inaction too and the President has not kept all of his promises but these pale in comparison to a Republican Party that is bent on establishing a wealthy oligarchy in this country who continue to privatize the public commons and whittle away at the vital programs of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid until only for-profit interests have complete control of all the natural and monetary wealth in this country.  Instead of demurely responding to the Republicans, the Democrats need to relocate their FDR, Truman and JFK roots and proudly support those programs that built up the greatest middle class in modern times.

Why don’t Democrats just say it? They really believe in active government and think it does good and valuable things. One of those valuable things is that government creates jobs — yes, really — and also the conditions under which more jobs can be created.

Decades of anti-government rhetoric have made liberals wary of claiming their legacy as supporters of the state’s positive role. That’s why they have had so much trouble making the case for President Obama’s stimulus program passed by Congress in 2009. It ought to be perfectly obvious: When the private sector is no longer investing, the economy will spin downward unless the government takes on the task of investing. And such investments — in transportation and clean energy, refurbished schools and the education of the next generation — can prime future growth.  E.J. Dionne, Washington Post   

We have serious issues with  people going without basic medical care, children who experience starvation, elderly having to choose between needed medications and paying the rent or utility bill each month and an environment that threatens us all as toxic pollutants continue to contaminate the air we breathe and the water we drink.  In the meantime the GOP has no problem finding money to subsidize oil companies who have had record profits, protect health insurers who fail to cover anyone with a pre-existing condition or who use less of your premium dollar to pay for services, and defend financial institutions “too big to fail” who continue to devise products that risk throwing the economy back into a tailspin and losing what gains we have made to recapture jobs and the housing market.

The republican form of government that was handed us by the framers of the constitution two and half centuries ago is ours to keep as Franklin suggested, if we are willing to fight for it.  lf we don’t, the special moneyed interests will.  These hounds are already at your doors dressed up as patriots screeching about “taking our country back”.  But are they talking about a time when we emerged from a Great Depression and a World War where there was a large and vibrant middle class?  Or do they refer to the one  they nostalgically pine for in pre-Civil War days when only white male property owners were allowed to vote and control the mechanisms by which we are governed?

 


The mainstream media and many bloggers are focusing on the Trayvon Martin killing as race-based.  Is something else really going on here, making race merely a bi-product of this shooting?

UPDATED 8:12am C 3/23/1


Judge Roy Bean and George Zimmerman.  Judge, jury and executioners?

 

 

 

 

In most of my writings that were aimed at ultra-conservatives, the Tea Party, right-wing extremists and their media talking heads, I have usually hit on a central theme of theirs that conjures up an America that existed in another time period.  Their call to reclaim America from their perceived enemies is not uncommon from some on the political left.  The difference as I see it though seems to be one in where the more conservative factions want to relive an era where minorities were mostly disenfranchised and along with women, had little political power.

Following the recent killing of Trayvon Martin in Sanford, Florida, I can now add vigilantism to this state of mind.  Hispanic-American George Zimmerman, who falsely claimed to be an authorized neighborhood watch captain, most likely killed Taryvon Martin with the belief or knowledge that a new law would protect his right to do so.  Furthermore, according to a report by Brendan Fischer at the Center for Media and Democracy, the shooter has legal immunity from prosecution.

The law, also pushed by its supporters under the name the “Castle Doctrine,” changes state criminal justice and civil law codes by giving legal immunity to a person who uses “deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.” It also bars the deceased’s family from bringing a civil suit.   SOURCE

Upon close scrutiny, the actions of shooter George Zimmerman and the poor response from Sanford Police Chief Bill Lee, the bygone law of the West seems to be in force.  Judd Legum on the ThinkProgress blog has broken down the details of this event via recorded news accounts.    Here’s a thumbnail sketch of Legum’s report

  • Zimmerman called police to report “suspicious” behavior from what he presumed at the time was a black person.  He also presumed Taylor was “up to no good, on drugs or something” and then told the police dispatcher that  “These a**holes always get away”
  • Zimmerman pursued Taylor after he was told by the police dispatcher not to.
  • That Taylor posed a threat to Zimmerman is dubious since, besides pursuing Taylor which initiated the confrontation, he was 110 lbs. heavier than Taylor and was armed with a 9 millimeter handgun while Martin was found carrying only a bag of Skittles and a can of iced tea
  • Martin had no criminal record while police records show that Zimmerman “was charged in July 2005 with resisting arrest with violence and battery on an officer”.
  • The police failed to test Zimmerman for drugs or alcohol use.
  • They failed to properly question Zimmerman.  A source inside the police department told ABC News that a narcotics detective and not a homicide detective first approached Zimmerman. The detective peppered Zimmerman with questions, the source said, rather than allow Zimmerman to tell his story. Questions can lead a witness, the source said.  SOURCE
  • Police accepted Zimmerman’s version of who yelled out for help rather than those of some witnesses who felt certain it was the voice of a child and it appears they amended the initial police report that had no account of a bloody nose or wet shirt on Zimmerman

There are a couple of other issues here that incriminate him.   First, his father told sources that his son has a spotless record before the assault incident in 2005 was revealed.  Second, Zimmerman’s behavior in his self-appointed role as a watch captain and how he carried this out seemed zealous to many of those in his community.  It didn’t help either that there was a prevailing attitude toward what one resident of the Retreat at Twin Lakes community referred to as “low-lifes and gangsters”.  Such was the assessment of one of Zimmerman’s acquaintance, Frank Taaffe, a former neighborhood block captain.

What makes this less of a racial issue however and more of an historical mind-set issue is the fact that Zimmerman is of hispanic heritage and a few of his neighbors, including two black residents, reported that they liked and trusted him.

We currently don’t have any documentation to attest to Zimmerman and Taaffe’s political persuasion to see if they were stringent pro-gun, anti-Obama advocates; especially those who are prone to rally around the “take our country back” call .  But what we do seem to have is that their state of mind reflects those people who are unable to grasp the social changes our nation has been undergoing for the last half century and  whose fear of people unlike themselves often draws negative preconceived notions

Legitimate concern for one’s safety, especially in a neighborhood where crime is prevalent would understandably affect some to the point of purchasing a weapon to protect themselves and give them a sense of security.  The neighborhood that Zimmerman lived in and Taylor was visiting that week back in February this year seemed to be such a place.

“police records, …  show that 50 suspicious-person reports were called in to police in the past year at Twin Lakes. There were eight burglaries, nine thefts and one other shooting in the year prior to Trayvon’s death.

In all, police had been called to the 260-unit complex 402 times from Jan. 1, 2011 to Feb. 26, 2012.”    SOURCE

Forty-six of those calls, over 10%, were made by one man – George Zimmerman.

When fear grips the mind beyond a point that justifies it, people can over react to perceived threats.  Time and the fact that the local police are not always able or even willing to see things as seriously can lead a person to think they have to take action into their own hands.  A reaction that was the norm on the frontiers of early American civilization.

The one restraint that has perhaps prevented many of these people to go over board in acting on their fears are the laws that forbid people to act in vigilante style.  Remove that public restraint and people like George Zimmerman will begin to feel empowered to chase a suspicious asshole down and draw his 9mm handgun to kill him if he gets too close; an encounter that resulted in all likelihood because one zealous individual didn’t know where to draw the line in protecting his neighborhood.

The political right’s pervasive fear that the America they claim they once knew is disappearing under the leadership of a black president with distant ties to the Muslim faith has overwhelmed so many to a point that has allowed the state of Florida and 21 other states to revert back to the Wild West, issuing “stand your ground” laws, that were essentially written by the NRA, and allow citizens to shoot anyone, even away from their own home, who, under the new law “reasonably fears [anyone who poses an] imminent peril of death or great bodily harm to [themselves] or another.”

I don’t think it has dawned on some people that as they vote for those politicians that keep making deep budget cuts while avoiding raising taxes to provide basic services like police and fire protection, they are opening that dangerous territory where the heavily armed yet undetected mentally unstable individual down the road can shoot you in cold blood if your dog unintentionally poops in his flower bed.  Or it could be someone like George Zimmerman who has allowed the real or perceived racial tensions in his neighborhood push him over the brink and revert to actions we outlawed, for good reason, over a century ago.



Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 81 other followers