"You're not making an impact if you're not pissing someone off"

Tag Archives: John McCain

Re-blogged from HumorOutcasts.com 

Those of us who blog owe it to ourselves as well as our readers to post compelling material as best we can.  We may not always succeed but that should not diminish our efforts to do so.  In that vein we should also be willing to avail our blog to others whose material meets the standards of good writing that informs as well as entertains and thus alters somewhat our perspective of how we see things.  It need not always be serious in nature.  In fact, I think writers infect a greater audience about certain realities in our world when they employ humor.

So I submit the following piece from Kara, the nom de plume of an individual who characterizes himself as a “family Guy/American Dad/TCS Producer/Citizen of the World. He also explains that his opinions are his own, “and do not NECESSARILY reflect Fox’s positions or opinions.”  He posts regularly on the HumorOutcasts.com blog I subscribe to and on occasion contribute to.

In this piece entitledMore Terrible than Fiction Update – Polonius from Hamlet and John McCain”, Kara shows us a remarkable comparison between the Shakespearean character of Polonius and his contemporary, John McCain.  It is both clever and insightful about a man who has fallen from a status that he perhaps never should have been elevated too.  But first, this short feature presentation of Kara’s on Sarah Palin  Enjoy.

 

sarah-palin

What fiction writer – if any – could have conceived of Sarah Palin without completely blowing the boundaries of reality? Dickens? Shakespeare? Ruth Rendell? In children’s fiction, maybe, where a parodic lunatic still has its place. It’s not really in grown-up literatures nature to have stone cold villains, coal-black embodiments of evil. Serious literature has no shortage of killers, molesters, kidnappers, cannibals, misanthropes, black widows, bloodsuckers, pederasts and politicians…and there are plenty of literary counterparts to modern assholes (change Italy to Iraq in Catch-22, and Milo is Dick Cheney and Colonel Cathcart is George W), but of the snidleliest whiplashes ever to have bound sweet damsel to train track, has any serious writer of novels ever conjured up a sub-literate rube from a weird, frozen tundra, a vicious “hockey mom” to 5 terrible children who shoots wolves from helicopters? Or a character as farcical as “Anne Coulter”, or as grotesque as Roger Ailes?

Polonius from Hamlet by William Shakespeare and John McCain

mctongue-pic  Polonius

King Claudius’s chief counsellor and father of Ophelia, Polonius is an old fool and self-absorbed windbag whom Shakespeare referred to as a ”sincere” father, but also “a busy-body, [who] is accordingly officious, garrulous, and impertinent.” For all of his obsequious manner, Polonius must have some abilities to have attained his present high office, but will never ascend to exalted rank.

Polonius’s oratory style is overextended confidence in his knowledge, pride in his eloquence, his dotage encroaching upon his dwindling wisdom. His pomposity comes from knowing that his mind was once strong, and unawareness that it has become weak. He drones on, pedantically and impertinently, with artful turns of thought, amidst actual serious business. He is a victim of the dereliction of his faculties; he forgets what he’s taking about; loses the order of his ideas, and entangles himself in his own thoughts. His phrases are ambiguous and confusing, and he sometimes loses the thread.

Polonius poses as a wise statesman, but cannot resist childish strata­gems, seeing things in black and white, discovering coverups and intrigue at every bend and acting on unsubstantiated suspicion to disastrous consequences. Nearly every event in the place results from from his ill-judged influence and the blunders he perpetrated.

Polonius likes to give “when I was your age” speeches, dishing out lame advice, overeagerly dispensing characteristic specimens of cootish pearls of wisdom in boorish fashion. His attempts at humor are bumbling and pathetic. He is inadvertently hilarious. In a dark play, Polonius is comic relief . When one of the players delivers a heart-wrenching rendering of Priam’s death and the hullabaloo to follow, Polonius interrupts to say , “This is too long.” Polonius coined the paraphrased aphorism, “Clothes make the man”.

John McCain has been called many things during his endless Washington career — “craven,” “shameless, senile”, “amoral,”stupid,” “drug addled,””pompous”, “world’s worst pilot” and “completely full of shit”. He is equally loathed by liberals, conservatives and the people of his alleged “home state,” Arizona. He seems brain addled, often confused, like when the avowed foreign policy expert mixed up Sunni and Shiite Muslims, or repeatedly referred to the Czech Republic as “Czechoslovakia”. Senator McCain routinely, manifestly loses his grip on the present, appearing not unlike a certain person who “could speak no sense in several languages.”

Superannuated politicians like John McCain seldom have any strength to fall back upon, so default to the resources of memory. He loves talking about his soldiering days. You know, his storied career where he routinely got in trouble with authority for crashing planes and ended up a POW because he wasn’t a very good pilot. It’s truly an inspiring tale of mediocrity and downright stupidity. He is an old man, a windbag, and out of the ashes of his extinct faculties come meaningless but sincere homespun aphorisms. as a blind man may seem to distinguish colors, so long as he refrains from speaking of the colors that are before him.”

In addition to his apparent cognitive problems, Senator McCain exhibits a distressing deterioration in his sense of decorum and propriety. He volunteered his wife for a topless beauty contest, and jigged around singing “Bomb-bomb-bomb-Iran. This loss of self-regulation is called “disinhibition” and can result in inadvertent hilarity. Who can forget “the fundamentals of our economy are strong.” Or how he was unable to answer how many houses he owns. Or when he said to his trophy wife: ”At least I don’t plaster on the makeup like a trollop, you c*nt”. Or him sticking out his tongue at the end of the third presidential debate after getting confused and walking off the stage the wrong way. Or calling on an absent Joe The Plumber at a rally, accidentally endorsing Obama, calling his constituents “my fellow prisoners”, his general confusion, and being less than informed. Oh, and the gorilla rape joke.

McCain’s usual gracelessness is amped up by a staggering lack of self-awareness, such as his churlish whining about liberals supposedly getting favorable press coverage. McCain’s career has been unremarkable, from abandoning a seriously-injured wife in favor of a rich replacement, to the Keating Five scandal to his bone-headed selecting of Sarah Palin as his running mate, with little of real distinction to fill the gaps, except for the THREE DECADES that he has been shouting “Cover Up!” at every turn. The DC press corp’s calculated burnishing of the “Maverick” myth, puffing up his credentials, burying his scandals, and crafting a heroic public persona, made him the 2008 GOP presidential nominee, and suckered us into believing he was a “hero”, rather than an opportunistic and deeply vindictive pol who once crashed a plane. His best moment –by his own account–consisted of refusing to accept the early release offered by his Viet Cong captors. Like Polonius, McCain is a man strong in general principles, who fails repeatedly in application.

No amount of pity for the physical ordeal he endured in his youth could have compensated for the reality that John McCain is an erratic, pompous, petty and self-serving man and a notorious SOB even by Washington standards. The same man who was hanging around with the rebels, encouraging them to overthrow Ghadaffi, while calling for increase support for them is now running around blaming others for the actions of his buddies in Benghazi. The arrogant, pig-headed “war hero” has managed to turn into a lonely, sad, pathetic old man whimpering in a bitter, cold rain of his own making.

Polonius is hiding behind a tapestry in Gertrude’s room, when he gets scared and yelps for help. Hamlet draws his sword and thrusts it through the curtain. Polonius is stabbed in the gut. “Thou wretched, rash, intruding fool, farewell! I took thee for thy better”. – Hamlet


The presentations by the candidates in last night’s presidential debate should have removed any doubt who has the foreign policy strengths.  Obama made distinctions that Romney could only agree with.

In 2008 Barack Obama’s critics said that he was an “empty suit” compared to John McCain on foreign policy.  Though it was an ugly assessment it had great merit at the time.  Obama ‘s national political experience was fairly nascent in 2008 and his foreign policy savvy was almost non-existent.  Had the country not been so determined to shuck the failures and abuses of the Bush administration, which by default fell on any GOP candidate for President, this foreign policy weakness could have lost it for Obama.

Fast forward to last night’s foreign policy debate with Mitt Romney and you see a Barack Obama who has mastered not only the language of a foreign policy expert but who has a broad and in-depth understanding of the matrix that is critical in setting policy here and abroad to sustain a position of leadership in global affairs.  Gone was the “empty suit” that many accused him of being in 2008.  Yet when Mitt Romney clearly displayed a similar weakness last night, as he has this entire campaign, supporters raved how well he displayed a “leadership” image.

Style, not substance, all of a sudden became a ringing endorsement for the crowd that always liked to point out how the GOP had the foreign policy creds.  And it was this approach that apparently seemed to be the card that the Romney campaign wanted to play based on the political spin put out by his operatives following the debate.  During the debate many conservative commentators were lamenting Romney’s performance.

David Limbaugh asked on Twitter, “Why do these advisers tell Mitt not to go for the jugular? Why?  Laura Ingraham was essentially doing the same – Romney using kid gloves ag[ain] — WHY?!”   The ever vivacious S.E. Cupp thought that “Obama is making laughable, easily argued points. But Romney’s not effectively arguing them.”    I find it presumptuous for anyone to say there is any “jugular” there.  Even Romney’s attacks on Libya are falling apart.

Afterwards conservative pundits were trying to portray Romney as “restrained” while painting Obama as agitated and overly aggressive.  Some of us thought we saw the reverse of a Presidential debate #1 and yet conservatives now view the candidates differently.  Looking presidential was more important than attacking your opponents weaknesses.

Try as he did to come off as a poised leader, Mitt Romney was often flustered in how to respond to foreign policy details posed by President Obama

Comments were similar by Romney supporters who went to the blogs to present their views on who they thought won.  It was an obvious defense for a man who had now become the empty suit of the campaign.  His ideas were neither fresh nor pertinent.  His cold-war state-of-mind seemed to think an Iran with nuclear weapons was our greatest national security threat (something they are years away from by the way) yet who had told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer back in March this year that Russia was “without question our number one geopolitical foe”  On this, Obama had perhaps one of the best one-liners of the night.  “The 1980s called, they want their foreign policy back.”

What was clear about the Romney strategy last night was that since he was a light-weight compared to the President on foreign policy, his goal became, which many say he achieved, not to get entangled in details he has no knowledge about.  His one strength was to try to connect a weak economy with a weak foreign policy effort.  But the President was ready for him on this issue to.  Obama pointed out how Romney leans towards sending troops back into Iraq and appears too eager in suggesting that boots on the ground may be required in Syria and Iran.  “After a decade of war, I think we all agree, we need to do some nation-building here at home,” the President told the audience in his closing statement.

Tying Romney to a cold war, militaristic approach nullified, I thought, any attempt on Romney’s part to assure many voters, especially women, that he would not be quick to send our sons and daughters back into harms way.  This point could have been driven home more vividly had Obama pointed out that the members of Romney’s foreign policy team are essentially the same who helped define the “preemptive strike” doctrine of the Bush/Cheney era.

[On] July 12, Governor Mitt Romney [was] attending a GOP fundraiser hosted by former Vice President Dick Cheney at his home in Wyoming. It’s fitting, really, since Romney has called Cheney a “person of wisdom and judgment.”

[When Romney was considering] possible running mates, it’s worth remembering that he pointed to Dick Cheney as the “kind of person I’d like to have” working with him.

Out of Romney’s 24 special advisors on foreign policy, 17 served in the Bush-Cheney administration. If Romney were to win, it’s likely that many of these people would serve in his administration in some capacity — a frightening prospect given the legacy of this particular group. The last time they were in government, it was disastrous.    SOURCE   

Perhaps Romney’s performance last night did present itself to many as a calm leader who would not cave under the stress of global conflicts.  This is indeed a quality that exudes leadership.  But knowledge and decisive action speak louder than appearances.  Obama has demonstrated this capability, along with a cool-headed demeanor, and was convincing as commander-in-chief in last nights debate.  Once Romney opened his mouth it became apparent that he was more concerned about having his feelings hurt by Obama while coming across as agreeing more with the President than as someone who has any bold new approach for addressing crises around the world.

If it were appearances we were going for instead of knowledge and certainty then this image of Romney would be appropriate

Horses and bayonets’ is the hot new meme


Seemingly oblivious of what actually brought us to this America they don’t recognize,  the only cure for the Right seems to lie in the disease itself.

I may be guilty of progressive blasphemy but it would almost, almost mind you, be worth it to hand the political power back over to Republicans if for no other reason than to abate the  hypochondria that is so pervasive within their ranks.  The chicken little infection that seems to have  contaminated all pundits and politicos on the right would have us believe that Armageddon is in sight and that our darkest days are ahead of us.

Jon Stewart highlighted such a mental state in a recent “We are the World” skit on Tuesday (2/1), referring to Glenn Beck as the Woody Allen of Fox News.  In the world of ultra-conservatives, magnanimous and wondrous things occur only if their view of the world is realized.  The impurity of anything non-christian and left of center politically is a threat to their small-minded vision of what some see as an attempt to “destroy America as it was originally conceived.”

Unless you have been on another planet the last two years the casual observer could not help but notice this festering mental condition, which developed following the 2008 elections, where Democrats won majorities in Congress and put the first black President in the oval office.  I saw the evolution of this first hand in a single instance following the elections as I helped at a voter precinct that night.

Before the volunteers had all left, a few of us were cleaning up and got the early results in that Obama was likely going to win the election over McCain.  One of the volunteers, an apparent staunch conservative, opined that we were on the road to perdition.  She was sure Obama was the anti-Christ and said something to the effect that we should all get on our knees that night and pray for salvation and deliverance.  Unable to see beyond a life style she had become accustomed to, this woman felt as if that world would be lost forever to the one she feared would result under Obama and the Democrats.

Like a junkie hooked on heroine, they saw their source for a fix being removed from them.   Their only salvation was to sustain the days that allowed them to bathe in unrequited luxury from hefty tax cuts and government subsidies that enlarged their portfolios, along with visions of grandeur as the global savior spreading freedom and fighting evil abroad.  Their world was filled with streets of gold while main street traveled down pitted asphalt roads and their leadership mirrored their culture and taste, white and well-healed.

Just days earlier the attitude among these newly developed hypochondriacs was anything but nonplussed.  Things weren’t all that bad under a Bush/Cheney administration if you were white, wealthy and conservative.  The rest of us were not doing so good.  The status quo had created the greatest wealth disparity between the haves and the have-nots in modern times and yet all was wonderful for the fundamentalist Jesus crowd whose income was derived from investments in Wall Street, not the labor of Main Street.

So almost immediately on November 4th, 2008 the mental state of conservatives went from innocuous contentment to despair, oblivious of the fact that economic disaster had already been heading down that track months earlier towards the financial ruin for millions, including a lot of them with their derivative-laden portfolios.  I suspect though that had McCain/Palin won the election that most of them would have remained optimistic.  They may suffer marginally but hope would be just over the horizon for them because all would be corrected by the invisible hand of the market.

The blind loyalty to conservatism and their free-market ideology sees no real transgressions when things go bad for most of us because their influence in Washington always has their backs covered.  The dull stagnate growth of the economy under Bush/Cheney benefitted from a developing housing bubble (fostered by greedy finance managers) that would ultimately come crashing down in late 2007.  And though the middle and lower classes were seeing stagnate wages and even diminishing income while jobs were shifting to foreign markets, the wealthiest 2% were experiencing great profits and dividends that essentially blinded them to their own destructive orgy.

Not until Obama and the Democrats took control of the political reins of power were conservatives shaken from their fantasy world to see what was happening, and like Rip Van Winkle who slept through the changes, were unable to connect the financial ruination under Bush/Cheney to what they were awakening to.  Their new awareness of their own excesses were extrapolated over to the new administration and their fretting has gone unabated ever since.

Waking up to find a member of the “minority” in the oval office and suddenly discovering that the labor force consisted of an expanding hispanic population, their 19th century values and heritage were shaken as fear gripped them like a fawn in a lion’s cage.  Their mental collapse could be heard in Tea Party rants about “reclaiming America” and denunciations about how socialism was supplanting capitalist traditions, even though many are dependent on the “socialist” safety net of Social Security and Medicare and who suffer the recriminations of private health insurance who boot them from coverage when their health care costs exceeds limits that negatively impact profits.

It’s been noted to me in the past by corporate visionaries that perception is reality and when people demand a lifestyle that may in fact be against their own self-interest, the individual suffering they incur as a result is more acceptable to them than any alteration to their perceptions.

Thus for these poor souls who see nothing promising under Obama, only disaster, they are willing to reconvene the tactics of people who created 10% unemployment, unaffordable health care coverage, abuses in financial markets and a damaged image abroad so their affliction can be cured, blindly hoping that the cure may yet still be in the disease.


Looking beyond his final “good night, and good luck” send off.

I thought at first he was informing us that his “Countdown” program was going to transition into something new and different when Keith Olbermann announced last Thursday night that this was his last telecast.  I grew somewhat shocked when it became clear it was not and that he was indeed leaving MSNBC for good, with no prospects of his progressive views airing again; progressive views that helped many of us make it through the nightmare administration of George W. Bush and his curmudgeon vice-president Dick Cheney.  It also served as a counterbalance for the right wing malignancy being aired on Roger Ailes’ FOX news, what Olbermann himself referred to as “FOX noise”.

Not many of us heard of Keith when he first filled in and later remained to air what was then seen as a humorous take on top stories of the day back in 2003.  But news of him spread like wildfire when he took a hard turn in our direction on August 30, 2006 as he aired his first of many “special commentaries” that would become a mainstay for him for the next few years.  This one was a blistering attack on Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and his cavalier approach to the invasion and sustained war in Iraq.

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld shares a ...

Image via Wikipedia

Olbermann’s words struck at the heart of a man and an administration that had for too long got a pass from the press for sheer arrogance, thus lifting the spirit of liberals and non-liberals alike everywhere.

Within hours the blogosphere was abuzz about the man that gave new hope for sanity’s resurrection in an era when neoconservatives were pushing the limits of moral responsibility.  For me personally I hadn’t been this charged since I heard Howard Dean attack the wrong-headed policies of Bush/Cheney on Meet the Press in 2002 as he also  notified listeners about his candidacy for the 2004 Presidential nomination.

Olbermann’s “Countdown” segment quickly became a broadcast staple for liberals and turned out not to be such a bad move for a faltering MSNBC.  A recent report by the AP noted that “‘Countdown’ became MSNBC’s most popular show. Instantly, a network that had often floundered in seeking a direction molded itself after Olbermann.”       

And as it did  more of us from progressive quarters helped boost those ratings and at times challenged the popular segments of the O’Reilly Factor, Hannity and Colmes and others on FOX during that prime time period.

As his popularity grew and his voice challenged the policies and inherent failures that guided the Bush/Cheney White House, the hope that not only Democrats would regain seats in Congress in 2006 but that some of them would be like-minded liberals became like cool running water to an arid progressive landscape.  Olbermann came along and literally pulled many of us out of the doldrums that was so pervasive at the time.  Our voices were being shouted down by the more prominent right wing talking heads on FOX and radio broadcasts like Rush Limbaugh and a rising poster child for the lunatic fringe, Glenn Beck.

I don’t feel remiss at all to say that had Olberman not changed his Countdown segment with a “liberal bias” that many who would finally find the courage to challenge the Bush/Cheney White House might never have advanced as quick as they did.  Surely his  success as a broadcaster would not have reached the level it finally did.

Olberman became part of trio with the other progressives broadcasts of Jon Stewart’s “The Daily Show” and Bill Maher’s “Real Time” that pushed the mainstream media into taking a closer look at the message coming from the White House and moving away from the neoconservative viewpoints of conservative commentaries  The support base that evolved from such programs ultimately fired up a grass roots drive that not only garnered wins for Democrats in 2006 but helped pushed their Party in 2008 to some of the biggest majorities in the Senate and House that had not been seen for decades.  The coup de gras was the Presidency recaptured as Barack Obama defeated a lack-luster John McCain and a then unknown, Sarah Palin.

I will miss Keith and his Countdown program.  I must confess there were a few times when I thought he made some tacky remarks but that hardly served to deflect from what was his greater contribution to the national dialogue.  However, when there was a comment that went over the line, as it did when he commented on Louisiana Senator Vitter’s wife’s attire and demeanor in a news clip that had her standing by her unfaithful husband, Olbermann came back the next day saying “there was no justification for such a segment about what a woman, a victim of her husband’s inappropriate behavior was wearing in public… so to Mrs. Vitter and to you, the viewer, I once again apologize.”

I can only count on one hand how many times this occurred with Keith over the years, the apologies that is for faux pas he had made.  Has his adversaries over at FOX made similar conciliatory gestures for many of their gaffes, their are not enough fingers to mark their sins by.

It is still not completely clear what the circumstances were that led to Olbermann’s exit from MSNBC.  There were clearly some tensions between him and management that became exposed last November when he was suspended for violating an NBC policy on campaign contributions; a policy that didn’t seem to be evenly applied to all at the network.  This air of conflict between Keith and his bosses, combined with the weight of losing his mother and father within a short period of time may have influenced his decision to call it quits.

What does appear to be clear to me at least is that his decision to leave was not some temperamental reaction but an honest assessment of who he was, where he was and what he wanted to do.  I believe him when he said that his continued presence there was more a response to the public’s “insistence” that he carry on than his desire to stay.

There were many occasions, particularly in the last 2½ years, where all that surrounded the show – but never the show itself – was just too much for me,” Olbermann said in his exit statement. “But your support and loyalty and, if I may use the word, insistence, ultimately required that I keep going. My gratitude to you is boundless.”

His exit then is more a reflection of a man being true to himself rather than currying favor with a management whose focus always has their eye on profit margins.  His absence should not be seen by those who rallied to his side in the dark days back in 2006 as an end to what he helped start.  Instead we can thank Mr. Olbermann for being there when we needed him and choose now to sustain that impetus to achieve future progressive gains.

“Good night, and good luck”



Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 81 other followers