"You're not making an impact if you're not pissing someone off"

Tag Archives: denton texas

At a time when there is growing concern about the safety of our food supply and the often hazardous means to produce it, home-grown organic suppliers can fill the need to supply families with nutritional food at reasonable costs.  

Though still around today, farmers markets were more commonplace and visited routinely when I was growing up in the 1950’s


There’s a movement afoot that is reminiscent of an earlier time for me and the entire baby boom generation as children in the late 1940‘s and 1950‘s.  Though we always idealize our past there are those real aspects of it that elicit fond recollections of things simple in nature that encompass family and a smaller community.

One of those experiences was buying our food at grocery markets where the produce, meats and dairy products were processed by local farmers and ranchers.  There was also the regular visits to the farmers market with parents and grandparents in downtown Dallas.  Before there were Safeways and Krogers there was Jerry’s Meat Market and Kettle’s Food Store.

It was a community of people that we were dependent on for basic needs and who we shared certain values with.  In today’s global markets this perception is imbued in many of the advertisements for products bought and sold but in reality, much of what we purchase in markets today no longer originates within those finite boundaries we consider local.  Today, the nostalgia of small, local food co-ops is seeing a rebirth in many areas across the country.

The post-WWII baby-boom generation is perhaps the last generation that fully realized a time when most of your food needs were met with purchases from a local mom and pop operation whose food supply was from local farmers.  If you wanted prescriptions, toiletries and greeting cards you went to Skillern’s Drug Store.  There was no such thing as a latte but if you wanted a cup of coffee you could only get that at places like Norma’s cafe.  Pretty much everything else you needed could be purchased at Sears, Roebuck & Co.

The corporate supermarkets that have emerged since the 1960’s changed this, providing the consumer with the convenience of one-stop shopping.  My generation saw this as a good thing at the time because it was new and exciting; not something old-fashioned that our parents and grandparents were accustomed to.  But in our acceptance of this future transition I think we were emotionally robbed of the personable interaction once found dealing with an independently owned business operated by people who lived in your area.  Many businesses today are national or International, run by managers for some corporate ownership far away.

Co-ops are regaining popularity again, perhaps by those who want to regain that lost sense of the past but mostly as a local source of nutritional food you won’t necessarily find in the supermarket chains.  Not only do the larger, modern supermarkets tend to diminish a sense of community but they leave a larger carbon foot print in order to stock their stores with the vast array of goods they provide consumers with today.  My home town of Denton, Texas is lucky enough to have a food co-op but it is struggling to find a bigger consumer base and sufficient suppliers to compete with the commercial giants.


The Cross Timbers Food Co-op (CTFC), run by a small group of people, is working to re-establish a system to purchase food products from local producers, keeping our money here while also providing sources of income for these people along with job opportunities for future growth.  Buying local home-grown products gives consumers fresher food and it reduces the carbon-foot print created by transporting such goods over long miles from other states and countries.  Less energy for storage and packaging is also required since your food gets from the farm or ranch to your table quicker.

How Safe Is the Food You Purchase?  Over 40 percent of all fresh fruit consumed in the U.S. comes from Mexico, Chile, Guatemala, Costa Rica, and other foreign countries, traveling hundreds, even thousands, of miles to reach our grocery-store shelves.  Eating food grown elsewhere in the world means depending on the soil, water, and sanitation conditions in those places and on the way their workers farm, harvest, process, and transport the products.   According to the CDC, each year in the United States 76 million people suffer from foodborne disease; 325,000 of them are hospitalized and 5,000 die.   SOURCE

These co-ops provide produce, dairy and meat products from suppliers who use organic techniques that avoid the use of synthetic chemicals and antibiotics to enhance production.  These chemicals can pose health hazards for consumers if safety measures are not regulated and monitored.   They also use measures for growing that strengthen soils and avoid industrial agriculture practices that continue to damage and deplete this valuable natural resource.

While intensive plowing and monocrop agriculture systems have caused nutrient depletion and wide-scale soil erosion, over-application of fertilizers and pesticides have contaminated our soils and polluted our waterways  –  Sustainable Table 

Current purchaser membership in CTFC stands at 339 active accounts but only a fraction of those use the co-op on any kind on a regular basis.  Approximately 53 members have ordered more than one time over the years the co-op has been in existence.  Memberships cost a one-time, refundable $50 fee.  There is also a small service fee added to each order that is based on the amount of your purchases.

CTFC uses Hilltop Montessori School at 1014 N. Elm in Denton to distribute its food every other Saturday between 1:30 and 3:30pm.  The Montessori school is owned by CTFC member Julie Winnette who made the facility available after the food co-op lost their previous delivery site located a couple of blocks off of Denton’s town square.  Orders are placed on-line during the week preceding the delivery date, allowing suppliers time to process the orders and have them ready a week after all orders have been submitted.  There is no delivery so all items are picked up by each consumer.

Wylie Harris is usually in place to hand out orders on distribution days and has been doing this since August, 2006; several months after he and some others first incorporated the co-op. He lives the organic way of life.  “I got interested in starting a co-op like this after seeing what Bob Waldrop had done in Oklahoma after I was assigned to interview him about it for my ‘formal-sector’ job”, Wylie explains. “The Peace Action Denton group was hosting a conference intended to spark efforts toward local sustainability not long after that, and I managed to get Waldrop included on the slate of speakers. He stuck around ’til the evening of that conference to come to the first co-op organizing meeting.”

When not contributing his time to CTFC he works out of his home in Sant Jo writing web and newsletter content for the Kerr Center for Sustainable Agriculture (KCSA) in Poteau, Oklahoma,  “an award-winning non-profit educational foundation [that has] committed its resources and programs to the goals of ‘sustainable’ agriculture.”  Then there is the time that Wylie and his wife Ozlem spend with their own farm where they tend to the cattle, chicken and vegetables that primarily serve their personal needs.

Along with building up CTFC’s membership Wylie would also like to see a larger supplier base.  The ultimate goal for the Cross Timbers Co-op is to increase the number of delivery locations and expand down into the metroplex.

There’s always a kind of chicken-or-egg dynamic going on in that nobody wants to buy if there’s not a good product diversity”, Mr. Travis tell me,“ and nobody wants to sell if there aren’t enough customers to make it happen. At the moment I feel like we’ve hit a pretty good product mix, and now need to advertise the co-op to a wider audience to increase sales to make it worth the existing producers’ while. The organizing group envisioned the co-op serving a wider area – Sherman to Wichita Falls to D/FW – and I’d like to see progress toward that goal, however incremental. Our core customer group to date has always been solidly based in Denton proper.”  

Wylie Harris checks supplier list at CTFC’s distribution location

 

CTFC lists some thirteen suppliers currently who provide products ranging from chicken and beef to an assortment of vegetables and spices.  There are also suppliers who provide soaps, coffee beans, eggs, baked sweets and goat cheeses.  About half of those provide their product on a seasonal basis.

Rose Creek Farm supplier Pamela Johnson with Wylie Travis preparing orders for another Saturday distribution

The current and only chicken supplier, Rose Creek Farms, is owned by Pamela Johnson and her husband Ronnie.  On a visit to Rose Creek Farms in mid-June I met up with Pam and Ronnie to see just how invested they are in supplying healthy, organically raised chickens.  They’re raised in mobile pens so they can be shifted to areas on the Johnson’s 30 acre farm that will provide a continuous supply of sun, grass, insects, and left over veggies from their own garden.  Besides these natural food sources for the chickens the Johnsons grow some of the feed for them and supplement it with a Certified Non-GMO product.

The Johnsons also serve as the primary supplier of vegetables and spices for CTFC.  Below are just a sample of the vegetables they grow on about 3 acres that are fertilized with an organic “tea compost” that runs through a system of soaker hoses running parallel with the plant rows.  It is a mixture of water and compost they have composed with some molasses and alfalfa to enhance the microbial life to feed their plants.   Their soils are mainly sandy so they use a wood chip compost to stabilize this growing medium, allowing it to retain moisture longer.

 

 

From top to bottom:  Beets, cherry and yellow pear tomatoes, Armenian cucumber and green beans

 


Rose Creek Farms is located on CR 2788 just outside of Alvord, Texas which sits about 10 miles north of Decatur in Wise county.

Prior to getting into the organic farm business Pamela was a civil engineer, building bridges and other infrastructure items for Isbell Engineering Group out of Sanger,Texas.  Her husband Ronnie began framing houses when he was fifteen and eventually started building homes, which he did for years in the North Texas area before buying their farm in 2007.

Though Ronnie and Pamela are a primary source of produce for CTFC they are also part of the grass-roots organization, Certified Naturally Grown (CNG) that originated out of Poughkeepsie, New York.  Their first obligation is to supply a local customer base that pay an annual $30 fee per family for the privilege of ordering in advance freshly grown produce directly from Rose Creek Farms.  Pamela feels the CNG approach better accommodates the needs of small farmers with lower fees and insuring the organic quality of members

CNG’s approach is called a Participatory Guarantee System. PGS is employed by tens of thousands of farmers worldwide. These programs minimize paperwork and certification fees and employ a peer-inspection process built on local networks. They’re typically a better fit for small-scale producers who sell locally.   SOURCE   

Rose Creek Farm owners Ronnie and Pam Johnson

 

Small organic farms like Rose Creek are a challenge, economically and physically.  It requires a devotion from people like the Johnson’s to supply healthy foods to consumers who want to know not only where their food comes from but what’s in it.  Buying from a local food co-op like CTFC not only gives this assurance to consumers but allows them to make healthy choices that protect their families against potentially harmful additives and minimizes the carbon foot print that large-scale operations require.

Having a single distribution point and paying prices that are slightly higher than you find at supermarkets may seem a disadvantage for many who would like to make this healthy choice but there are advantages that outweigh these considerations.  The time and drive are often not any more than most people incur shopping at Kroger’s, Safeway or Tom Thumb’s.  There’ no fighting crowds are standing in lines shopping in the store because your selections have already been made on-line.  And though organic foods are a bit higher because of the time and effort involved to produce them, the health benefits offset such cost by keeping you out of the doctor’s office and away from pharmaceuticals often needed to correct physical ailments that result from deficient diets.

 

FACTOID: Just how big is each individual’s carbon foot print with the conventional means of supplying food in today’s markets?  In the United States, 400 gallons of oil equivalents are expended annually to feed each American.  SOURCE

 

For further information about the Cross Timbers Food Co-Op and their organic food suppliers, contact Wylie Harris on the CTFC website at crosstimberscoop.org/

Eating healthy foods avoids contracting many of the illnesses society pays for in high medical costs


If Money’s No Obstacle, Have I Got a Peanut Butter Shake For You

 

There’s an original eatery in the small city of Denton, Texas north of Dallas that many have referred to as “a 50′s style drive up burger joint” called Mr. Frosty.  It is a 50’s style restaurant, not as a nostalgic design replication by some contemporary firm but because it’s appears now just as it did when it opened in the 1950’s.  The exterior and interior have been kept up for all of these years but you can see the wear and tear is there, which in a quaint old way, gives it some character.   How else would you be able to explain why this place still draws crowds nearly everyday it’s open, even after a new Sonic® was built less than 200 yards away just a few short years ago?

It’s likely this restaurant was built about the same time the Interstate Highway System began construction under Eisenhower, running Interstate 35 one short block from Mr. Frosty.  It had to be one of only a few buildings at the time and this area was not quite so seedy as it is now, with pawn shops and Christian soup & salvation kitchens mixed in with small mom and pop businesses that are housed in rough looking buildings that probably struggle to pass the city codes’ minimum standards for occupation.

That being said, you would only imagine that their food is so remarkable that the locale is not a distractive factor for Mr Frosty patron’s.  But who are their patrons?  You might think that it would only appeal more to the blue collar, trucker crowd with their moderate means of income.  But one look at the price of a Frosty’s favorite will dispel that notion pretty quick.

 

Then again, Mr Frosty has been around so long that it may have preceded the use of the decimal point


It has been a long tough slog but corporations have finally cajoled their way into the concept of personhood.  If only they were really flesh and blood people they would understand that there are things more important than money.

Since the founding of this country there have been battles fought in the courts that have, bit by bit, stretched the principles of the Constitution to a point that ultimately sought to achieve a human status for the creations of mankind, that which has historically belonged solely to the human race.   It is the “unalienable right” asserted in the Declaration of Independence as being the self-evident possession of humankind “endowed by their Creator”.  Can a corporation that answers primarily to investors and a CEO of the corporeal realm take on the characteristics of those whose source of faith is alleged to be a higher supernatural power be seen as an equal?

Following the recent decision of the conservative-heavy Roberts’ court in the Citizens United vs. FEC, words alone that emanate from the diaphragm as it pushes air from human lungs through the vocal folds in our larynx is no longer viewed as the only form of “speech” to which the Constitution applies.  By some immense stretch of the imagination, this controversial Supreme Court decision has declared that M-O-N-E-Y has now become a legitimate mode of speech,  which corporations have vast sums of compared to most real people.  This action ignores the conflicting reality that some of the humans who make up a corporation are now somehow separate from their individual human status by legal fiat and can have essentially two voices that the rest of us do not.

 

The legal whizzes that not only argued this case for corporations but who on the court accepted it, use a form of linguistics uncommon to most of us.  I won’t venture into a debate over the legalese that only a select few engage in.  I haven’t the time or inclination to argue the merits of this lunacy with people who have only their own self-interests at heart.  What I do want to discuss though is the perception that came out of this that corporate citizen are on a level playing field with the rest of us.

I attended a recent city council meeting in my hometown of Denton, Texas that was specifically arranged to address the issue of extending the current ordinances in place for drilling natural gas wells within the corporate city limits as well as any “Extraterritorial Jurisdiction” (ETJ), stated in the information the city provided for those individuals interested in attending these hearings.  Denton, and the county it’s in, set atop the northeast sector of the Barnett Shale in Texas.

The special city council meeting was for the sole purpose of gathering human citizen input on how best to proceed to extend existing city ordinances that govern the exploration, development, and production of natural gas wells.  An all volunteer 3-member panel Citizen Task Force had been selected to gather this information and present it and their recommendations to the City Council

Denton gas well task force members below from left to right areTom LaPoint, Vicki Oppenheimer and John Siegmund 

The meeting, one of several to be held over the next few months, took place at Denton’s Civic Center, including members of the city council who were present only as a formality in that location to accommodate an anticipated large crowd that the council chambers couldn’t.  It seems this was’t necessary after all.  There were roughly 50-60 people there including some media and representatives from the natural gas industry.  By in large though, it was mostly citizen activist who were there to voice their concern on how natural gas wells should or should not be allowed to exist in close proximity to their homes, their school, churches and parks.

It was a good mix of people, from the two college students who represented the generation that would deal longer with the effects of gas wells in this community to long time residents who were now contending with the odors and environmental impacts of gas well noises and toxic waste water open pits.  In total, 19 people came before the committee to convey their concerns and opinions.

 Citizen Joyce Pool has dealt with

 the problems of gas well noise and

open waste water pits for over a decade

Real Estate agent Phyllis Wolper brought attention to diminished land values that occur when gas well are drilled next to homes and other commercial developments

After most of the local citizens had their say, Gilbert Horton, a representative of Devon Energy, “one of the world’s leading independent oil and gas producers” and Martin E. Garza, a Dallas attorney who specializes in real estate and land use/zoning issues who has been representing natural gas interests since 2001, gave their assessments to the task force.  These two men and one citizen named Ben Claybore conveyed the industry’e viewpoints, essentially expressing their concern that creating too many hindrances for gas drilling interests would deprive the industry of their constitutional rights and could have negative “economic consequences” for the area.

   

Devon Energy Representative Gilbert Hooten and Dallas Lawyer Martin Garza

Horton said there is a “growing body of fact-based research” that supports the safety of hydraulic fracturing (also known as fracing) and prompted task force members to consider this above “the emotional comments” many who had come before him had made.  Garza reminded the task force members that there are state and federal guidelines that may conflict with adaptations to the city’s ordinance and that prudent measures utilizing cost-benefit analysis should also be weighed before imposing new regulations.

Clearly these are legitimate arguments that ultimately the city council will have to consider as they eventually review the task force’s considerations based on such hearings.  But the degree to which they should be considered in light of not only the equally legitimate concerns many voiced that evening about the ill-effects of drilling and the fracing method used to extract the product is a topic of concern that poses a challenge to the rights of men and women versus the newly proclaimed rights of corporate citizens.

  

Do human citizens’ concerns about the negative impact of fracing and the use of local water supplies out weigh a need to provide jobs for some and enlarge the city’s tax base?  Those who convey and support corporate interests always take the tact that the corporate citizen is a partner in the community since they do provide jobs and pay taxes.  But unlike flesh and blood citizens they ultimately owe their loyalty to outsiders that make up stock holders and executives at corporate headquarters in another state or even another country.  Some of these headquarters are deliberately located in countries that serve as tax havens for businesses who seek to keep more of their capital for stock holders and bonuses for top executives.  That’s what businesses are primarily expected to do; make profits and expand their wealth and sphere of influence.

Their contributions to the community in the form of financial grants to education and other vital social services is indeed a welcome benefit to these entities but it also serves as PR to community leaders that can be influential in giving an unfair advantage to their voice over those citizens whose separate financial contributions are a legal obligation that come in the form of mandated property and sales taxes.  Except for the very wealthy philanthropist, most human citizens are unable to give above and beyond what their taxes cover for consideration in the eyes of those who “make the rules”.

Neither can individual common people entice political leaders with appeals to their selfish nature in the form of generous campaign contributions and positions of status and generous incomes in the businesses sector once they leave the public domain.  Large corporations also have deep pockets to create legal challenges to public-conscious politicians that the average citizens doesn’t.  Such litigious challenges are intended to wear down battle-fatigued public officials to abandon the fight if victory is not soon apparent.

For the most part, only those individual citizens who share a common interest and join together as a single entity have the capabilities to fight on a level playing field with the corporate citizen; but only to the degree they sustain a cohesive front of the multiple individual self-interests of members who are willing to tough the fight out over the long haul and provide financial resources to match those of their corporate counter part. Such endeavors that have been successful and have played their cards appropriately have forced the corporate citizen to weigh the cost-benefit measures of doing battle with such public grass-root efforts, forcing them to concede to the organized ban of citizens.

 Not all citizens are the same. 

Say hello to a corporate neighbor

But where this public opposition fails to crystallize as a large body, the corporate citizen is usually the victor.  And even then there is less hope for such grass-roots organizations if local politicians have already developed favorable relationships with the corporate entities. Thus the lone individuals or even a very small group find it difficult to fight a monolith that combines corporate and political interests.  On a true level playing field each “citizen” should be able to protect their life, liberty and property against the wants and desires of the corporate citizen.  They often lack the wherewithal to fight the notion that claims corporations serve economic benefits that outweigh the quality of life for individuals.

If our neighbor is engaging in activity that threatens our health and means of production the courts are quick to act in favor of those people who will be impacted by such practices.  But if that neighbor is a corporate citizen then there is a different standard that seems to apply.  Asking the corporate citizen to cease and desist those practices that threaten our quality of life gets special consideration because what they are doing creates jobs and tax revenue, benefitting more than just themselves.

This is a sound argument until you add the elements of costs to individuals in the short and long terms that impact their health care costs and other out-of-pocket expenses they incur to offset the damage done by the corporate citizen, not to mention the toll on a human’s quality of life.  In the case of gas drilling, the fracing process injects known toxicants into our drinking water supplies and allows deadly chemicals to escape into the air we breathe.  The process destroys the land on and around it for decades making future development of any kind unlikely, lowering the value of homeowners in the area.  The serenity of neighborhoods are diminished and even removed as the noise from production takes away from the neighborhood that which was once a major appeal to homeowners – the tranquil sounds of nature and children playing in that natural setting.

We need the businesses that free markets create and their needs to be limits and guidelines by which they can peacefully coexist with the real people they find themselves among.  Most small businesses fit in perfectly with this scenario as they become  assimilated into the local human matrix and are genuinely welcomed.  But when the mammoth scale of corporations intrude and try to pass themselves off as “one of us”, they do so with only the intent to make a profit where they can and then move on to the next locale to manifest their business model.

The people who work at these large corporations are routinely the locals themselves.  That in itself is sufficient to have someone represent the company in terms of local appeal.   But when top management that headquarters and lives outside that community as well as their investors, they shouldn’t be allowed to double their representation in the form an individual defined in our founding documents as those who possess unalienable rights “endowed by their Creator”, unless everyone is willing to redefine “Creator” in such documents as commercial, for-profit entrepreneurs.



Haircuts a’ la Sweeney Todd not for the faint of heart


I live in a rather large town just north of Dallas.  When I first came to Denton in 1975 to attend college the population was roughly 36,000 people, and lot of those were the students at Texas Women’s University and my alma mater, the University of North Texas (then known under a “lesser” title as North Texas State University).  Today the population has nearly quadrupled with over a 124,000 according to the recent 2010 census and incorporated land mass I suspect has doubled.

Yet there are parts of Denton that still harbor that small town feel.  It has the 19th century style town square with the Victorian architecture on its 3 story courthouse.  We have a popular state fair that brings in 4H and FFA contestants across the state and there is also a local paper, the Denton Record-Chronicle.  Characteristically of a small town newspaper, the Record-Chronicle still posts the daily police records referred to as “The Blotter” on page two, detailing mostly mundane and normal occurrences that the police department responds to.

On occasion though there is the report that is outside the norm and has a life of its own.  Take the one in today’s edition about the wife and grandmother whose alleged efforts to trim her unsuspecting husband’s hair brought an assault charge from her grand-daughter.

Seriously, here’s the link to the report lest you think I engaged in my morning ritual of reading the paper before I was fully awake.  According to the report , the daughter who was staying with her grandparents at 2600 Augusta Dr. heard shouts for help from her grand-father.  When entering the room where they were she found her grandmother on top of grand-dad “trying to stab him with the scissors”.  It’s not clear if they were on the floor jostling or in a chair that perhaps grand-dad had dozed off in.

According to the police report “In the struggle, her grandmother tried to stab her as well, the granddaughter told police. When the granddaughter was able to get the woman away from the victim, the grandmother kicked him in the arm, the report states. Then the grandmother got in her car and drove away.”

Apparently by the time the police had arrived there was no suspect and perhaps no weapon at the “scene of the crime”.  This perhaps led the attending officer to question the sincerity and the facts of the victims and as a result was given a cell phone number to the grandmother.  When the officer made contact with the would-be scissor attacker the grandmother gave a perfectly “rational” explanation of what transpired.  Rational of course if you accept that there were cuts and bruises on the victims and grandma had fled the scene to Oklahoma.

This entire incident took on the serious role it normally should with someone’s life being threatened and the actions of an apparent crazed woman fleeing the scene.  But what follows takes this story to a different level, a more comical nature and leaves all realizing that fact is always (sometimes humorously) stranger than fiction.

“The whole thing was a misunderstanding” the grandmother insisted. “I was merely trying to cut my husband’s hair” she testified to the officer over the phone. However, it appears that granddad viewed it more in terms of a scalping rather than a haircut. A metaphor that many a dissatisfied recipient has accused relatives of for trying to get a trim job on the cheap.



Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 81 other followers