"You're not making an impact if you're not pissing someone off"

Tag Archives: 2012 elections

With the advent of the 2012 elections approaching many hopeful Democrats are waiting to catch on fire as they did prior to the 2008 elections.  There is something missing today however that propelled the “Yes We Can” candidate to a record majority vote just less than 3 years ago?

Following President Obama’s re-election announcement last week there was pretty much a lack-luster response from his base and many others.  The excitement that permeated the political scene in 2008 and created momentum the essentially steam-rolled over his political adversary as it did for many Democratic candidates seems seriously lacking.

The Great Recession that began in Bush’s final year soured a lot of people’s attitudes before Obama took office and carried over to his administration by a well orchestrated campaign of Astroturf organizations funded by corporate money in the fossil fuel and health insurance industries.  The belief that somehow Obama was responsible for the massive job losses and home foreclosures enabled his adversaries to get  poorly informed voters in 2010 to reject what they had just supported two years earlier and put back in a more extreme element of those who had collaborated with a self-serving few that were responsible for the collapse of our economy.

One of the enduring threats of any democracy is to hope that an educated and well-informed public will prevail.   As Ben Franklin was leaving Independence Hall at the Close of the Constitutional Convention in 1787 a lady approached him and askedWell Doctor what have we got, a republic or a monarchy.   A republic”replied Franklin, “if you can keep it.”

Before the Obama administration and the Democrats could correct the civil-rights violations and the heavy-handed policies the GOP had pushed through that favored the wealthy, the economic collapse created an animosity between Main Street and Wall Street as, first George Bush and then later President Obama, bailed out private industries while millions of Americans were losing their jobs and eventually their homes.

It is likely that without these bailouts the economic crisis would have deepened but the ideological angst that was overcome with shock and horror from those on the right who were unwilling to concede that their precious free-market system had failed and those on the left that were angered by the lack of government’s response to aid working families, were too emotional to gather their collective wisdom and allow Obama’s stimulus package to do its thing.

click on image to enlarge

By the time the economy started to rebound from these efforts there was already a successful movement afoot to disparage everything the President did and conceal his achievements as anger still simmered with many Americans whose income had either been lost though unemployment or reduced by employers struggling to hang on.  An educated and well-informed public was nowhere to be found.

Sadly, the problem we face today is not that Obama and his supporters have not tried to close the political divide in this country but that there has been no sincere effort on the part of the those in GOP politics to concede to the mandate of the 2008 election and work in harmony with this administration.  Yet Obama has been slow to see this and it is this over-optimistic view with him and his advisors that continue to bend to the will of the  minority in this country rather than standing up to them and defending the measures that most Americans support.  It is this apparent kowtowing to the extreme fringes on the right that kills any inspiration at this time to rally to the President’s side as he attempts to jump-start his campaign for re-election in 2012.

His lack of leadership in the fight for health care reform and climate change legislation was and has been mostly absent.  Had it not been for the efforts of Nancy Pelosi in the House and Harry Reid in the Senate, we would not have the health care reforms we have today.  The arguments those on the right put out there to oppose these hugely important issues are weak and without merit yet the President has not taken the bully pulpit to dismiss what is basically nonsense and non-science.

He is too reticent to defend the EPA’s right to monitor the air quality impacted by fossil fuel generated power plants.  He has allowed deep-water oil drilling to resume without actually confirming that new and real safeguards are in place to prevent another BP oil disaster.  He has failed to fight vigorously to defend our legal system by shutting down Guantanamo and he was sheepish in his meager efforts to criticize those haters who demonize an entire religion because some wanted to build a community center near ground zero.

Our deficit crisis is NOT purely a spending issue as the GOP claims and his failure to hang tough to keep the Bush tax cuts in place for the wealthiest 2% conceded the right’s claim that the revenue this tax increase would generate would not help lower our debt.  There has been no elaborate speaking out on how the rich are getting richer through tax loop holes while the rest of us pay our fair share of taxes as our wages diminish.  Federal spending has proven itself to stimulate the economy during recessions yet Obama has bent to the failed policy arguments that trickle-down economics will somehow rejuvenate the economy even though this practice has been proven false on so many fronts.

And now there is talk that when the President addresses the nation tomorrow on budget decisions he will be considering that Medicare is now subject to some cuts even though it has successfully covered the health care needs of millions who would otherwise be unable to afford private health insurance policies.  Medicare has its issues with costs but most of that stems from fraud and high private sector costs that Republicans seem unwilling to address seriously.

The options to correct what ails Medicare can be eliminated with other cuts to Defense spending, eliminating corporate welfare subsidies and raising the limit on wages that can be taxed for Medicare so that more of the wealthy’s income can be brought in to play here; those people who already pay less than most middle-income Americans because of a flawed tax structure that benefits them.

I understand that from a political perspective there are stands that have to be tempered with reality and that politics has to be hashed out in order to achieve the victories in the future.  Giving in to something is necessary on occasion to win enough support from the moderates and independents who are really that part of the electorate that throw the victories to one camp or the other each election cycle.  But also what matters and what get’s out the consistent support of voters are signs from our elected officials that indicate they are willing not to bend too far and give up too much; playing politics as usual to sustain the status quo.

As Obama moderates his positions too much he becomes just another politician in the eyes of voters who are not steeped in what makes the political machinery operate in this country.  When this happens, those of us who will continue to support him because the alternative is far worse, will fight an uphill battle because there will be less sophisticated voters who are not inspired enough to contribute campaign resources, vote at all or worse, go over to the other side believing that somehow the GOP has been reborn again into something better.

We need that inspiration Mr. President but for most of us it will only come when you begin to show more signs of leadership as a fighter for things worth fighting for and then stick with it.  Like the character Tevye in “Fiddler on the Roof”, we can only bend so far or else we will break.


Will conditions that kept  Progressives home when many Independents shifted back to the GOP in 2010 still exist in 2012?

I was struck recently by a poll of Wisconsin voters that showed 53% supported the unions on the issue of collective bargaining.  This is clearly at odds with Governor Scott Walker’s contentions that what he was doing in addressing the state’s budget crisis, including the removal of collective bargaining for union workers, was what the people of Wisconsin expected of him when they elected him.  Other than proposing cutting state employee wages and benefits, there was never anything in his campaign platform about busting the balls of unions there by depriving them of their collective bargaining rights.

This fact then led me to my next thought which asks the question, “How did Tea Party-type candidates really get elected over their Republican primary foes and go on to beat the Democrat in some races?”  For the Libertarian strain in American politics it is believed they have touched a nerve with the American people and I think that’s true but only to a point.  The part that isn’t true and that the GOP is trying to hype is their narrative that promotes corporate wealthy interest in this country are “what the American public wants”.

But if the polls around the country on the issues raised by the GOP are any indication of “what the people want” then one has to ask, what are Republican’s smoking and where can I get it without driving to California.

Other “Tea Party” issues that are unpopular with the American public are those that want to cut or remove all social welfare programs, including Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid.  Not one poll I have seen supports such notions.  In fact, a recent Gallup poll shows most Americans support what true Libertarians and their adopted GOP Party oppose.  Other than supporting cuts in foreign aid, those polled showed they supported Education, Social Security and Medicaid/Medicare by large margins.  They even support by a 6% difference the funding for the arts and sciences; that liberal cause that funds among other things, NPR and PBS.

Other polls also conflict with the GOP view of American preferences.

  1. A Bloomberg national poll shows that only a third of Americans supported keeping the lower tax rates for the highest earners.
  2. 60% in a Gallup poll believe their representatives should agree to a compromise budget plan rather than shutting down the government
  3. 67% of those polled are dissatisfied about the size and influence of major corporations

So how did the values of ultra conservatives win in states where traditionally social conscience Democrats have had strong backing?  My theory is that the time was ripe for a change in politics-as-usual following the Great Recession of 2008.  The straw that broke the camels back for many was the bailing out of failed financial institutions while middle class workers were laid off in droves.  The feeling of abandonment by their government while being viewed as propping up wealthy enterprises that normally disdain government interference was taken as a step too far for people on both sides of the political spectrum to tolerate.

This anger was quickly conveyed by Ron Paul supporters who represent the Libertarian view in this country but was quickly echoed by others.  Seeing an opportunity to regroup from their miserable failures at the polls, Republican strategists made overtures to these supporters and were pressed to align with them by wealthy corporate interest that had heretofore supported many in the GOP.  The Tea Party was an off-shoot of this initial reaction which fulminated after Obama became President and was seen giving more money to Big Business by propping up the auto industry and then spending billions to jump-start the economy with his stimulus package.

The forming of the Tea Party identity can be traced to early protest following Obama’s inauguration by Libertarians and conservative Republicans who coalesced as a unit to oppose government-funded programs of any kind.  It was sustained by concerted efforts of billionaires David and Charles Koch who helped form the astroturf group, Americans for Prosperity.  The ability to sustain this anger was fueled by high unemployment rates and watching Wall Street rebound while giving healthy bonuses to the very executives that created the economic fiasco which created high levels of unemployment.

Obama and the Democrats efforts to stimy the escalating unemployment went unnoticed by many voters as did the reimbursement of bailed out banks and auto manufacturers.  Their successful efforts to fix health care reform in this country was falsely and deliberately painted as socialized medicine that would create “death panels” and take people’s health insurance away from them.  An angry population that was literally misinformed and naive about the political realities reacted as corporate interests had hoped and kicked out many Democrats and perceived “moderate” Republicans who supported those social programs that the GOP now claims most Americans find adverse.

So one can only hope that as the lies and distortions are revealed, generated by many on the Right, those voters whose “misery level” affected their critical thinking skills in the 2010 election will come around in 2012 and correct the changes that installed agents for  corporate interests  Not that all Democrats are guiltless of this themselves but the public would be hard pressed to find any who support abolishing the institutions of Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid or opposing health care reform and properly funding the nation’s educational system.

What the American people really wanted then and want now is a change in the status quo.  In 2010 this need created choices that wrongly removed people who were more likely to promote the voters’ own interests.  The short attention span of most Americans and the vulnerability to being swept up by emotional issues that demonize good and decent people is the factor that has enabled a small wealthy elite to control elections; elections that put people in positions of power who answer not to their constituents, but to the real owners of this country – large corporations and financial institutions.

The only worry I have at this point is how effective will this corporate influence be on putting enough lipstick on their anti-government pig; to continue to influence enough voters that voting against their own interests are still somehow the right thing to do?  Trick me once, shame on you; trick me twice, I must be a dumb-ass.



Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 81 other followers