"You're not making an impact if you're not pissing someone off"

Author Archives:

get a life

While watching a Texas Ranger’s ball game on the tube last night the camera panned the bleachers as they usually do throughout a game and they caught something that just wrinkled my skivvies as I watched it.

Three people sitting next to each other who apparently came together are each spending time checking their iPhones rather than enjoying their ballpark experience with each other and the fans surrounding them.

How desparate are we that we can’t go anywhere anymore without taking these electronic objects that obscure and block the human contacts of social activities?  Why bother to be a participant anymore in such events if all you really want to do is know what your BFF is doing or thinking at every moment of every day?

I have two short pieces here that sum up pretty well I think how social media today has robbed us of some of our humanity.

The first is a humorous piece with comedian Tig Notaro on Conan O’Brian’s late night show.  Click on Tig Notaro’s name at the top of this video to get the full size YouTube version

 

and the other is a verse from Native American poet Sherman Alexie – The Facebook Sonnet 

 


Christians are funny people.  They believe in an unseen God and even agree among themselves that he answers them in their prayers to him.  But let someone say that have a personal line to the man and, well … let this experience with a candidate for the North Miami mayor’s seat speak to this last part

051413+anna+pierre+endorsement

It’s traditional in politics, especially in pockets of the South where the culture is steeped in religion to convey to the voters that they hold “traditional Christian values” – an expression that is often code, telling voters that they are not a liberal Muslim socialist and that a “higher authority” guides their policy decisions, not the reality of grounded facts.

But clearly this candidate running for North Miami mayor has taken this tradition to a new level.  Claiming Jesus has endorsed her campaign is a game of one-upmanship that didn’t play out well with voters.  In a field of seven candidates Anna Pierre came in dead last with only 56 votes cast for her.  Think what would have happened had Jesus not been supporting her.

img_ap

While bongos are seen supporting Anna Pierre here in an earlier photo, the support she claims she had from Jesus didn’t seem to help her candidacy for mayor

Ms. Pierre’s self-confidence is apparent in her on-line bio.  She has claimed to have overcome many obstacles in her life.  “I hate to hear ‘No’ she tells us.   “I refuse to let people tell me you can‘t do this, you can‘t do that because I am a woman, because of where I come from, or because I have a French name. It’s like putting fuel in my tank.  And full speed ahead.”

I think being a french-Haitian woman is the least of her worries. Everyone likes a rags-to-riches story, especially when achieved by minorities.  But should she choose to run again in the next election cycle someone might suggest using a more realistic endorsement.  It may have worked for Bush in 2000 but Anna Pierre didn’t have his great wealth and political connections in the Supreme Court.


I believe the family is the primary determinant for establishing order out of chaos and serving to mold the larger social realm we are all a part of.  Within that context, a most critical responsibility falls upon the father to teach their sons that though their strength may be based in part on a physical advantage over the other members of the family, it is not one that should ever be used to destroy their self-esteem that is so vital for a fully productive life.

 

violent-man

There are only a few people in this world that I can’t express any tolerance for and at the top of that short list are the men who abuse children and women.  The pedophiles, the abusive boyfriend, the wife-beating husband or child-pummeling dad.  I, my two other brothers and one sister were raised by a father who, though never a likely nominee for the father of the year award, never physically abused us or our mom.

Yes, there was physical discipline that he administered but often as a directive from Mom.  Those quit occurring however at an early age when dad informed mom he was no longer going to be her punisher.  She could issue the physical discipline herself when she deemed it necessary or not at all.  As I recall, we never were “whipped” again by our father or even from mom for that matter.  Other forms of discipline came into play, like groundings and household labor tasks.

Dad hated the whippings and I’m sure mom did too.  They were both raised by a generation who deemed such practices as part of parenting.  This was one tradition I’m glad they saw little lasting value with.  There was however a more noble tradition that my parents were raised with and that was that a man never hits a woman – EVER.  Not that this ugly practice didn’t still exist or that some Southern Christian men even felt it was their natural right to physically correct women who would “forget their place” in the social order of the day.  But dad always viewed those men who would beat a defenseless woman as someone beneath him and I remember a conversation we had in my pre-teen years where he made this known to me.  Just that once, but it stuck with me.

Role Models

As a child of the 1950’s when TV was just starting to become a common fixture in most households, most of what we became engrossed in were the movies from the 30’s and 40’s that had strong male figures who served as role models for most of us.  Mine were Errol Flynn, Cary Grant, Jimmy Stewart and Henry Fonda.  Their masculinity always shined through in their performances but not in any overtly aggressive fashion.  If the plot involved a scene where a woman struck them across the face for some offense the man had said or did, he would not retaliate in like manner.

Only the villainous character would strike a woman and if our hero was in the same room when this happened, Bart the bad guy would soon realize the mistake he had made.  I identify with that reaction to this day.  These on-screen examples and my dad’s own words etched in stone for me, as it did I’m sure for many of my friends growing up then, that hitting a woman is never acceptable.

flynn-de-havilland-dodge-city_opt

In a scene from the 1939 film Dodge City, Errol Flynn offers Olivia de Havilland security with his respect for women and his six-shooter.  Today however there is less respect for women and over half of the violent acts perpetrated by men against women occur with guns

So was this life-lesson lost on too many other males of my generation?  Did some miss it and thus fail to pass it on to their sons?  Perhaps it isn’t that there are actually more instances of women and children being battered and abused today as a result of men who were not properly raised to respect women.  Perhaps we are just hearing and seeing more of this intolerable behavior because public attitudes have changed where it no longer remains behind closed doors.  This and the fact that we are more exposed to such behavior through the social media sources present today could account for what seems to be an epidemic of male aggression towards women and children.

I don’t know either if there is a link between those who abuse women and children and men who were raised under some strict orthodox view about the roles of men and women.  No matter what the political, philosophical and religious influences, there are examples of each where men have abused members of their family.  Yet, while I am sure no man with so-called traditional values would align themselves with wife beaters and child abusers, there exists a mindset inherent with conservative males where many take offense to the role of modern women today – working outside the family and raising children by themselves – and still hold that some forms of corporal punishment are acceptable for children.  The traditions of their youth where they were raised with such notions have perhaps been ingrained more permanently than others who take a broader view of social conditions today, especially as it relates to the family.

Do such men ultimately cross a line where physical abuse feels right to them?  If so, did their fathers fail to instill in them as mine did for me that you never hit a woman, or worse, did their fathers themselves serve as a role model for wife beating and child abuse?  Do their conservative values that fostered the notion that women are subordinate to men and sparing the rod spoils the child create a crack in that taboo wall of wife beating and child abuse?  Are the ones who cross that line also victims of abuse themselves or suffer mental health issues that prevent them from controlling their actions?

castro

I have no real sympathy for people like Ariel Castro who’s been charged with kidnapping three women in Cleveland recently, two who were teenagers at the time and held them as his personal sex slaves for 10 years.  There’s that part of me that wants to see him hung by his male genitalia and die a slow death from a thousand cuts.  Then there’s that part of me that knows that Castro is not normal in the head.   This makes him a victim too, albeit an unsympathetic one.  Sane and mentally healthy men raised in a manner as I and millions of other Americans were don’t easily fall prey to victimizing weaker people, especially women and children.

The brain is a durable organ under most of what life gives us.  But when it is traumatized from physical or emotional injuries, something breaks down that no longer allows one to see their world “normally” anymore.  Castro has already stated that he was an abused child but how much of this is a move by the defense and how much is real and related to what led him to do the awful thing he did to three innocent girls remains to be seen.  I’d be willing to bet that he was traumatized in some way that effected a healthy brain.  I’d also bet there was a father who never had that conversation with his son about respecting women and limiting any discipline to a child to things NOT physical or emotionally disturbing like, “you’ll burn in hell for that”.

I don’t know that people like Rush Limbaugh who belittles today’s modern woman the way he does is capable of caring out a heinous act like Ariel Castro.  But what makes a man publicly vilify a woman for her stand on birth control and refer to her as a slut and a prostitute?  Limbaugh’s audience numbers in the millions and I suspect more are men than women.   Mentally healthy male listeners who tune into Limbaugh’s talk show regularly are not going to victimize women in abusive fashions from Limbaugh’s frequent femi-nazi slurs.

Limbaugh  sandra-fluke-the-view

Limbaugh attacked Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke last year after she spoke to a congressional hearing about supporting birth control legislation in Obamacare

But what of those men who themselves suffered some early childhood trauma at the hands of their father or a step-father or a bullying uncle?  Are these men who also listen to the Christian-right preachers who rail against “promiscuous women” and warn of End Times to punish a “sinful” nation.  Does all of this congeal into a state of mind that pushes such unstable men over the edge and validate a notion that says they have a right to control women and children in some sick demented version of doing it for their own best interest?  Is this part of the thinking of some male conservative christian legislators in those states who pass laws that do all they can to control a woman’s right to an abortion?

We Need to Change

Back in March of this year there was a rally held in Dallas supported by conservative Mayor Mike Rawlings that featured notable sports figures including Emmitt Smith and Roger Staubach along with other local male religious leaders and politicians.   It was an effort to bring attention to domestic violence in Dallas where boyfriends and spouses are physically injuring and killing their lovers and wives.  Such an event, something unheard of when I was a child, tells us that our sons have not undergone that right of passage where a father talks to his son about respecting women.

mike rawlins

Dallas Mayor Mike Rawlings on stage March 23rd of this year in front of city hall with other notable speakers calling out men to act against domestic violence in the city

In Dallas [alone] last year, 26 women were killed by their intimate partners, up from 10 the year before. The death of Karen Cox Smith—whose husband has confessed to shooting her in a parking lot in January—has become a rallying point for those hoping to reverse the trend. Mayor Mike Rawlings is a big part of that effort, becoming a high-profile advocate against domestic violence in the last few months, and urging Dallas men to speak up and take responsibility.    SOURCE  

The group that had been formed from this effort is called Dallas Men Against Abuse.  When I went to its website and clicked on the link at the top of the page “What  It takes To be a Man” I was thoroughly delighted to see at the top of the list something my dad told me fifty something years ago – “A man never hits a woman”.  It’s corollary was also on that list – “A man teaches his son to respect a woman”

It’s good to have these ideals I’ve held so long validated by other men my age.  And its good to see some men standing up and trying to address the issue of domestic violence.  But a closer look at this group shows that they are simply “good Christian men” who appear to view wife beaters and child abusers as men who suffer a character flaw and tend to characterize such deviant behavior as “sin” rather than as a mental health problem.  Nowhere on their website does it discuss addressing mental health needs of known abused children and especially young boys who were raised with no fathers or fathers who were far more absent in their lives than they were present.

realmen

This cycle of violence by men towards women and children needs the message that Dallas Men Against Abuse is advocating to help deter further abuses, but like any deviant behavior that deals in violence, we can’t merely issue a “Just Say No” proclamation and expect everything to magically disappear.   There needs to be early intervention and constant support for men who show any signs of aggressive behavior in their family settings.  We need to watch male children who are known victims of sexual and physical abuse and track them during their formative years to ensure that the ill-effects of their abuse doesn’t lead to more of the same in any future relationships with women.

To never hit a woman is not something imprinted in our male genes. It is a learned trait and relies heavily on being brought up in a stable family environment where the father serves as a role model who respects his wife, loves his children and doesn’t routinely fall back on uncontrolled rage when life doesn’t play out the way he wants.  Our culture sends a mixed signal to many men with the media images played out in the cinema and the extremist voices on radio and TV that chastises women and children who don’t tow a strict religious interpretation of archaic scriptures.  It doesn’t help either when we force women to have unwanted pregnancies and men are too often absolved of their responsibilities for a child that has ever right to be raised in a loving, stable environment.  


I haven’t presented a good song on my blog in a while so here’s one for you.  It’s a good  one for Friday to start your weekend with.  It’s got a simple message that’s been around for a while, at least since Judy Garland sang “Get Happy” in the 1950 musical, Summer Stock

Forget your troubles and just get happy 

Ya better chase all your cares away 

This song is so much like that too.  More than just a feel good song, it’s one of those tunes that connects with the sensory apparatus in your body and gets your juices flowing.  And what better time to feel a little reinvigoration than the end of the work week.

Even if you no longer go through the grind of a 40-hour work week, like myself, we all need that little stimulus that was more familiar to us when we were younger.  If you’re not getting the itch to stomp your feet and clap your hands when this tune gets going, then you need to check yourself into the nearest mortuary.

serenaryder

Serena Ryder performing in 2009

The song is “Stompa” by Canadian musician Serena Ryder.  The world weighs in on us everyday.   Music like this helps us push back a little because “nothing’s gonna disappear.”   So step away from it all for just a little while and let the music move you to clappa your hands and  stompa your feet.


As of this morning, 5/6/2013, there have been 3,852 gun deaths since the Newtown massacre.    SOURCE

sane gun laws

In fiery rhetoric you would expect to see in a Thomas Paine pamphlet over 200 years ago or on the floor of St. John’s Church in Richmond, Virginia back in 1775 when convention delegate Patrick Henry gave his famous “Give me liberty, or give me death” speech, Wayne LaPierre has also stoked the emotional fires of NRA delegates in Houston, Texas this last weekend.  The big difference is that LaPierre is rousing the crowds not for a threat to any real loss of personal liberty but for a straw man argument that protects the special interests and profits of the gun industry.

LaPierre and NRA president, David Keene along with other gun advocates were trying to appeal to a sense of patriotism that has been exploited over the yeas to ensure that facts about sane gun control measures don’t take root in the perceptive minds of most of their members.  But this effort seems to be failing since recent polls show that 74% of NRA members are supportive of legislation that “requires a universal back-ground check for all gun sales”.  Even in Secessionist Texas where the NRA has surprisingly only a slight edge of being trusted more than President Obama concerning gun issues – 47% vs. 43%, a clear majority of Texans – 49% to 41% - favor a ban on assault style weapons.  

So the emotional appeals by LaPierre that affirm “We will never surrender our guns, never,” is a misleading affirmation that distorts what the public really wants following the senseless mass killings we’ve been experiencing in the last few years.  The view that somehow any legislation currently being debated in Congress or in town hall-style meetings across the nation is a move to suppress gun owner’s rights or remove any firearm from their homes is a dishonest approach by an NRA leadership that serves more at the whims of the gun manufacturer industry than it does to its own membership.

How many more classrooms.  How many more street corners.

How many more shopping malls.  How many more movie theaters.

How many more college campuses.   Enough!

Demand Action.

As a dad.  As a mom.

As a husband.  As a wife.

As a family.  As a friend.

As an American.

It’s time.  We can’t back down.

It’s time for our leaders to act.  Right now.

Demand Action

we demand action

from the YouTube presentation of Cartoonists Demand Action to End Gun Violence  

In his appeal at the Houston convention, LaPierre kept invoking the inclusive “we” as he attacked those who advocate reasonable restraints on the sell of certain assault-style weapons to those who have a criminal background or have proven to be mentally incompetent to handle firearms in a safe and responsible manner.  By identifying all members of the NRA as targets of attack by gun control advocates, LaPierre is trying to insulate himself and other NRA administrators from the criticism that has been aimed solely at their incomprehensible rationale for opposing any and all legislation on any and all guns.

“Our feet are planted firmly in the foundation of freedom, unswayed by the winds of political and media insanity,” LaPierre said. “To the political and media elites who scorn us, we say let them be damned.”  Even uber-conservative supreme court justice Anton Scalia has conceded that some forms of gun regulation are NOT unconstitutional.  

What is important to highlight here is that LaPierre and the message machine out of the NRA and other lobbyists for the gun industry are invoking a method that exploits that unknown fear element which resides in the human DNA.  The promotion of a slippery slope meme plays into the worst scene scenario fears that tend to exist in all of us.   Stoking such fears with reference to Hitler’s Germany and Saddam Hussein’ Iraq allows people like Wayne LaPierre to remind the NRA membership of how tyranny can grow when we “let our guard down”.  But these are exaggerations of the reality about gun ownership and omits certain facts about citizens in those cultures being too willing to surrender to the charismatic allures of ruthless leaders long before it was obvious their personal liberties were being taken from them.

The worst scene scenario being generated by LaPierre if gun control measures of any dimension are instituted is that it will lead to those conditions of tyranny we read about in history books. There is little to no basis for this zealous reaction in America today.  There are numerous safeguards in place to prevent this within our judicial system and state legislatures along with the fierce support for the basic premises of the 2nd amendment that are well imbedded within even those who do not own a firearm.  What seems odd to me here is that if it’s loss of freedom that motivates the NRA leadership, where were they when our privacy rights were being eroded under the gun-friendly Bush administration and GOP congressional majorities?

gun industry connections

What will be lost here however if background checks on all gun sells is implemented is market share for many gun manufacturers.  Outside of those periods similar to what we recently experienced when gun sells spiked out of fear following Obama’s election in 2008 and re-election in 2012, purchases will level off amongst “responsible” gun owners.  But sells to those people we want to keep guns away from will start to dry up, since they will no longer be able to easily purchase their weapon of death.    Society will benefit from this not because it prevents all murders and suicides but because it will likely effect a smaller toll on humans without the powerful impact of rapid fire bullets that can kill so many so quickly.

Wayne Lapierre confidently assures us that the Manchin-Toomey bill that failed to reach a 60-vote majority in the Senate last month would not have stopped the awful slaughter of 20 children and six of their teachers at the Sandy Hook elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut last December.  This sleight of hand comment has little to do with what Manchin-Toomey may have ultimately effected however if someone like Jared Loughner, James Holmes or Seung-Hui Cho were prevented easy access to powerful assault weapons with 30-round magazines.

For those of us who think Manchin-Toomey didn’t go far enough it is laughable to hear the NRA leadership describe it as “an assault on our 2nd amendment rights”.  Other than trying to keep guns out of the wrong hands by expanding back ground checks the bill also wanted to increase penalties against gun trafficking and invest in school safety.  There was nothing in it to represent a gun registry that was falsely alluded to by NRA spokesperson Cleta Mitchell in a recent NY Times debate.  There was nothing in it to register existing guns owned by individuals.  Nothing to validate the generated-fear of taking anyone’s gun away.

abc_gma_whycho_070419_mn

Imagine the lives that would have been saved had Virginia Tech shooter Seung-Hui Cho been forced to use the weapon above for his insanity had laws been in place to prevent him from purchasing the one’s he chose below.   

seung-hui cho

To listen to the rhetoric that piled up, one speech after the other, by dupes of the gun industry, you couldn’t help but walk away from the NRA’s convention in Houston thinking we were on the verge of being over run by jack-booted government thugs.  American citizens, including those members of the NRA, have nothing to fear from implementing a measure of sanity  to our out-of-control gun crime in this country.  But gun manufacturer gun lobbyists like the NRA do stand to lose healthy financial benefits if they fail to deliver for their benefactors.

RELATED ARTICLE:

Here’s How the Rifle That Just Killed a 2-Year-Old Girl Is Marketed for Kids


Some people choose to squander the advances we humans have made since we first crawled out of the cesspool of our evolutionary beginnings

brain dead

The human animal.  The one with the most developed brain, even if many still only use that portion they first had at the beginning of our evolution over 6 million years ago.  We are both beast and angel; awe-inspiring and all confounding.  We are at our best when we expand the limits of that organ contained within our skulls.  But some see that space better serving lesser needs.  For the right price, the outside of the cranium, not the inside, best serves their interests.

Goldenpalacecom head ads

Sure, they may earn some revenue for providing a part of their anatomy as a commercial billboard but they’ve also demonstrated the value they’ve placed on the essence of their being.  The tadpole they’ve evolved from has only served their need to provide more body space to give meaning to something of no redeeming value.  But in a world where we value the human being in us less than the cash we trade ourselves in for, who can be surprised that the lowest common denominator has persuasive powers over some?

Though they can feel good that they’re not a Pol Pot or a Josef Mengele, will they ever have doubts about their ability to aspire to anything other than being someone else’s tool?

tattoo-freak bizarre-guerrilla-marketing-golden-palace-streaker OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

And for those who were thinking these are merely new age Christians promoting that place that waits for all who earned a spot in it after their death – you know, the one with the streets of gold – prepare yourself for a letdown when you type in goldenpalace.com in your search engine.  On the other hand, this may give others something to look forward to after this life.


The notion that we are a free people or that “free-markets” work in all our best interests is a myth that is slowly eroding genuine personal liberties.  No better example of this misguided concept can be better demonstrated than by how wealthy special interests determine what we eat.

misc9

 

I could have spent this past week researching a subject matter that is close to my heart.   But then I would have gotten very little personal tasks done that needed to be done.  So I consider myself fortunate to find a piece on the Organic Consumer Associations website that did an excellent job of conveying a timely topic that can’t be stressed enough

In their piece, Climate Chaos: Boycott Genetically Engineered and Factory-Farmed Foods, Will Allen and Ronnie Cummins have provided us with one of the most detailed assessments I have ever read that frankly spells out how industrialized crop production and factory farming impact global climate instability, even more so than the mere production of fossil fuels.  I encourage everyone to read the entire article and absorb its wealth of information.

It hits virtually every aspect of the food we eat from the farm to the table and how the concentration of power to achieve this by those, motivated only for profits, has not only negatively impacted our health and economy, but threatens the sustainability of the planet itself   To whet your appetite I’ve provided a few paragraphs below from their article to indicate just how rich the information is that Allen and Cummins’ efforts have produced here.  Learn its message and share it with as many people as you can.

 

Irrefutable Numbers

Traditionally conservative World Bank scientists estimated in 2009 that animal farming worldwide emits at least 51 percent of the world’s greenhouse gasses every year. (3) In spite of these truly alarming statistics, the focus on efforts to mitigate climate change have not been directed toward reversing or reforming unsustainable, climate-disrupting farming practices. In spite of the fact that industrial agriculture exceeds the combined U.S. green house gas emissions from transportation, energy production and industry, the farm and food emissions are ignored and trivialized, and thus unregulated.

A large share of factory farming’s greenhouse gasses in the U.S. come from using fossil fuels in 25 million tractors, and millions of combines, mowers, balers and other farm implements. Another large and increasing share of those gasses come from nitrogen and phosphorous fertilizer production and use, and the spraying of ever increasing amounts of insecticides and weed killers as pests develop a tolerance to all but the most deadly and polluting poisons.

The animals we raise, mainly on CAFOs (Confined Animal Feeding Operations), and the feed we grow for these animals are responsible for a huge share of the excess greenhouse gas emissions and climate chaos we are experiencing. Currently 92.5 percent of U.S. farmland is devoted to grazing animals and grain production: corn, soybeans, wheat, rye, oats, barley and cottonseed for confined cows, hogs, chickens and turkeys. Consequently, most of our farmland produces food for meat- and milk-producing animals. This inefficient use of land produces a majority of the most destructive greenhouse gasses: methane and nitrous oxide. Only 7.5 percent of U.S. farmland produces vegetables, grains, fruits, nuts and berries for direct human consumption. (4)

 

We can survive indefinitely where all people have ample food supplies.  But by allowing a small wealthy elite to control the vast amount of resources that are inherently all of ours, we are dooming not only ourselves but future generations as well.  It is becoming more and more clear that our elected officials are working more for these special interests than they are for the rest of us.  So how can we achieve the means to turn things in a direction that favors every man, woman and child?  Will Allen and Ronnie Cummins offer this.

We need to change our food habits. We need to stop eating factory-farmed meat and milk products. Since over 90 percent of all non-organic meat, dairy and eggs in the U.S. come from factory farms, we need a nationwide boycott and marketplace pressure, in the form of a CAFO labeling campaign.

A drastic reduction in sales of products from CAFOs will lead to a major increase in the sales and consumption of organic, pasture-raised and grass-fed meat and animal products, which today account for only 5 percent of the market. As we boycott all CAFO products, which means choosing vegan menu options in most restaurants shopping more carefully in grocery stores and farmers markets, we need to eat more organic, climate-friendly vegetables, fruits, nuts, beans and whole grains. If you eat meat and drink milk, make sure that is pasture-raised and not raised in an animal prisons, such as confinement feedlots, hog hotels and massive dairies. Ask your grocer or butcher where the food comes from and how it is raised. Stop eating meat that is glued together with pink slime.

WeThePeople

If WE the people change our ways, by default we can change the system.  The only thing we have to lose is the repression of the mega-corporations that currently hold our lives in their greedy little hands.

“This is not a futuristic vision that must await more research. The appropriate technology for a world-wide shift to sustainable, organic agriculture already exists, and each year it gets more efficient and sophisticated.”  – Will Allen & Ronnie Cummins


What attention the explosion at the West, Texas fertilizer company has been getting from most of the main stream media has been to cover the lives of the first responders who died in this tragic event along with some of the residents of West who also suffered from an explosion that registered an equivalency of a 2.1 earthquake.  And as unsettling as all that is, it’s what you haven’t heard or seen in the media that will disturb you the most.

don'tmesswithtexas

Today I live a little over a hundred miles north of the small central Texas town of West in a region that became popular with many descendants of Czech immigrants in the late 19th century. West is perhaps best known by visitors passing through this small community off of Interstate 35 for the kolaches that are a pastry favorite of the Czechs, most notably sold at the Little Czech Bakery at exit 353.  In fact the town was officially designated “Home of the Official Kolache of the Texas Legislature” in 1997.

I know the town of West best from the mid-1960’s when a teenage friend of mine and I would travel down there most Sundays so we could watch the Dallas Cowboys play on the TV set at the VFW hall in West.  The VFW was also located at exit 353 but on the opposite side of I-35 from the Little Czech Bakery.  Don and I both dropped out of high school in 1966 to join the Marines but before that, when he had his little Austin-Healey Sprite, we traveled the 70 something miles from Dallas where I lived at the time.

In the 60’s the Cowboys hadn’t yet become America’s Team so sell outs to the game weren’t always assured.  If the local game didn’t sell out two days before it was played it was blacked out in the area.  Thus the trip to West, which for us, with gas around 25 cents a gallon then, made it cheaper to drive to West than to buy a ticket and watch the Cowboys play at the Cotton Bowl.  Texas Stadium had yet to be built.

czechstop & czech bakery in west czechstopmushroomcloudinstagram-crop_0

The Little Czech Bakery is part of a business that also supplies other needs for travelers sold in the attached Czech Stop.  As the picture on the right shows, this popular roadside stop was just 3 miles south of where the fertilizer plant was that exploded April 17th.

So this brief but memorable history with the town of West came back into my consciousness following the horrible explosion of the fertilizer plant.  The interest that developed for me following this explosion became focused on what caused it and any subsequent investigation to discover what led to the death of 14 people and where many homes and a 50-unit apartment building were completely devastated beyond repairs. It is this lack of media coverage regarding the investigation of what caused the explosion that grates at me.

Unlike the thoroughness by which we learned of the who and what of the Boston Marathon bombers as well as coverage regarding the victims, we have only been left with the somber reality of the fertilizer explosion by the televised tributes to its victims.  With the exception of the Dallas Morning News, why hasn’t the MSM here locally done more to expose what the conditions were at the West Fertilizer plant?

Though a “spokesman for the F.B.I. in San Antonio said Thursday there had been no indication of criminal activity in the West plant explosion,” I would challenge that presumption with the facts we have.  It may prove true that there was no certain individual or group that willfully set the fire that ultimately led to the detonation of the ammonium nitrate stored there.  A quantity by the way that’s been revealed to be “1,350 times the amount … that would normally trigger safety oversight by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS).”  But we do have evidence of misleading information from the owners of West Fertilizer, Inc. as well as what appears to be negligence on the part of of Texas oversight agencies that any honest prosecutor might deem worthy of a court’s interest.

Here’s what we know.

  • The West Fertilizer Co. was cited for failing to obtain or qualify for a permit in 2006 after a complaint [by nearby residents] of a strong ammonia smell.

  • Because of deep-budget cuts that undermans federal regulatory agencies, OSHA has inspected the West plant exactly once in the company’s 51-year history. That 1985 inspection detected multiple “serious” violations of federal safety requirements for which the company paid a grand total of $30 in fines. OSHA’s 1992 process-safety-management standard for highly hazardous chemicals is supposed to protect against disasters like the West explosion, but it wasn’t in place for that inspection.

  • The failure of OSHA to do due diligence here is related to a conflict between OSHA and the state of Texas regarding the number of employees at the plant.  “Some plants with 10 or fewer employees are exempt from oversight by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. A spokesman says the Texas plant had 13 employees when the accident occurred, but state records show it had only seven.” 

  • The fact that the “West Fertilizer Co. was handling 2,400 tons a year [in 2006] of potentially explosive ammonium nitrate in a warehouse near schools, houses and a nursing home” as noted in a Texas Commission on Environmental Quality  (TECQ) permit apparently didn’t raise any “concerns, either internally or with other agencies, about explosion risks or the proper management of a chemical already notorious in Texas history.” 

  • Bryan W. Shaw, Gov. Rick Perry’s appointee as TCEQ chairman, told the Dallas Morning News that “the state chemist and the federal Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration [have] responsibility for regulating fertilizer fire and explosion risks. But the regulatory scrutiny for ammonium nitrate storage that Shaw outlined does not exist”.

  • The logical state agencies for oversight are disavowing their responsibility to cover the hazards of storing ammonium nitrate, a chemical in fertilizers used by domestic terrorist Timothy McVeigh to blow up the Murrah Bldg. in Oklahoma City back in 1995.  “We don’t, at TCEQ, evaluate the explosive threat associated with these types of facilities,” said Perry appointee Shaw.  And according to agency spokespersons, “the federal pipeline agency governs only transportation, not storage. The head of the state chemist’s office, Tim Herrman, said his agency has no legal authority or expertise to pursue fire or explosive safety at places that store ammonium nitrate.”  

  • The knowledge Texas state agencies had about how “a routine fire getting out of control and superheating a container with a large volume of ammonium nitrate, widely used as a fertilizer and as an explosive [apparently failed to] discuss fire or explosive risks with the company or each other.” 

  • A West Fertilizer, Inc. risk management plan, given to the EPA, stated that there was a “no” checked under fire or explosive risks, even though they also reported having as much as 54,000 pounds of anhydrous ammonia on hand.  “The worst possible scenario, the report said, would be a 10-minute release of ammonia gas that would kill or injure no one.  The second worst possibility projected was a leak from a broken hose used to transfer the product, again causing no injuries.”  

  • Apparently the first responders who died in this explosion were either unaware or uninformed that when dealing with a fire where anhydrous ammonia was present that water should not be used.  Using water to fight such a fire“ will result in warming of the product, causing the liquid to turn into a vapor cloud,” says the website of Calamco, a growers’ cooperative in California.

business in texas

Now when you take all of these facts into consideration and then throw into the mix the apparent anti-regulatory attitude by Governor Rick Perry and most state agency administrators, especially the TCEQ, then it wouldn’t take a rocket science to draw the reasonable conclusion that criminal charges are not out of the question regarding the explosion at the West Fertilizer plant.  But it’ll be a cold day in hell before our so-called representative form of government seeks to criminally prosecute any business that some state officials themselves are culpable of for conditions that caused the deaths of innocent Texans.

After Tim Herrman defended his agency against any negligence, I found it interesting that “the Office of the Texas State Chemist, a division of Texas A&M University, is fighting a Dallas Morning News request for inspection and inventory records, citing national security concerns regarding ammonium nitrate, which can be highly explosive and used in bombs.”  To understand now how something poses a threat to our national security but at the time didn’t seem important enough to convey to the appropriate agency is the height of hypocrisy and seems more to be the actions of one attempting to expiate themselves for their failure in this matter.

This lack of attention to the safety of our workplaces and neighborhoods is no accident. It is the product of a concerted attack by the US Chamber of Commerce, industry trade associations, and conservative think tanks on what they see as onerous regulatory programs – but ones that were enacted by Congress over the years to protect the public from irresponsible corporate misconduct.   SOURCE

The corporate media in this country along with overly corporate-friendly government officials will go out of their way to expose every facet to justify their prosecution of the so-called “War on Terror” but don’t expect them to police themselves when it comes to criminal negligence or willful disregard for the public’s safety by devotees of “free-market” capitalism.

In a Washington Post op-ed piece, labor reporter Mike Elk noted that the “decline in [media] coverage has created an environment in which companies may feel as if they can get away with massive safety violations because they will face little scrutiny from the media and the public.”   A reporter at the Charleston Gazette who covered workers’ safety for many years, Ken Ward Jr., in a tweet to Mike Elk a few days earlier summed it up best when he said, “Terrorists want media attention, so we give it to them. Unsafe industries don’t want media attention – so we give that to them.”  

I can’t speak for all North Texans, but I know that my memories of the West, Texas I knew as a teenager have had sufficient consoling with all of the reporting done about the victims in that tiny town conveyed by the MSM.  It’s time now for some serious efforts  to expose the people and the conditions that led to this awful disaster even if that goes all the way to the governor’s mansion.  No more soft pedaling of the poor performances of the West Fertilizer Company owners and the state agencies we entrusted to carry out basic safety inspections.

Death in America

Death by acts of terror doesn’t even register on this graph

More people in this country have and will die from such industry negligence and regulatory agency incompetence than any acts of terrorism have or ever will.  Since May, 1886 there have been 23 attempted or successful acts of terrorism; domestic and foreign.  Of those 23 there have been a total of 3291 Americans killed.  2976 of those occurred on September 11th, 2001.  Due to work place safety issues some 4500 workers die each year on the job.  Just because some have problems viewing criminality beyond the desperate acts of low-income people or those with middle eastern ancestry is not something that decent people should abide by.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Smoking gun in West, Texas, fertilizer blast: lack of government oversight

Why did West, Texas, build homes and a school next to a ‘time bomb’?


new_sun

A change of pace for me.  Yesterday was a good day and it was aided tremendously with the near-perfect climate conditions here in my hometown of Denton, Texas.  A climate that centered around the warming effects of the sun.  So I thought I would share this day in a brief post accompanied by some images of the sun I took as the day progressed, along with appropriate tunes that coincides with the line I linked it to in my post, that just also happen to be the title of the song.  Okay, that last part is going to become hammy as you read but hey! I’m allowed that every now then, no?

It starts out with my morning walk with the pooch and it’s a clear crisp morning with a temperature of about 45 degrees.  I caught this view of the sun peeking through the branches of a magnificent grouping of Post Oaks.  What a good day sunshine is starting my morning off with

Sunrise

When I get back to the house I write a little bit on my blog and read those blogs of most of you who comprise my daily on-line reading.  It’s late morning and I remember I haven’t watered some of the new plants we put in earlier.  Unlike earlier days with the rain we’d been having, I can see clearly now that bright blue sky that was hidden by those clouds.  (I can feel the eyes rolling out there.  Be nice)

late morning

After running to the city landfill to pick up a load of bark mulch that get’s recycled from those residential pickups of tree limbs, I deposit them in a new area where we replanted some cannas from the front of the house an area along the driveway.  I unload what’s left of the mulch for later use on the back side of the house, have some lunch, take a shower and my post lunch nap.  Then about 2pm I go out on the back patio and sit down with a small bowl of grapes, strawberries and cantaloupe and catch these rays   Is that … yes it is. Sunshine on my shoulder  

sunshineonmyshoulder

I spent some time reading Wenonah Hauter’s Foodopoly, an excellent account of the food industry in this country and the pressure they put on small and medium farms to compete with the large scale argribusinesses and the factory farms.  Then I prepared some whoop-ass plant-based tacos with seasoned brown rice, black beans, onions, jalapeno, tomatoes and avocado slices for the evening’s dinner …

plant-basedtaco

… before wounding up later in the same company I started the day with as the pooch and I watch and listen to the sound of sunshine going down.

sunset

TGIF – Have A Great Weekend


Is it just me or does the media reporting of recent tragic events like the Boston Marathon and the West, Texas fertilizer plant explosion make others ill watching supposedly intelligent people behave like they haven’t got the wit of an  inchworm.

more useless news

I don’t want to diminish the tragedy of the Boston bombing or offend the pain and suffering of its victims and the survivors of those who died.  There is a lot left that remains to be told about how a cold and senseless act of terror impacted those who experienced and witnessed that awful day.  There are intimate stories that need to be told about the acts of courage by public and civilian first responders who bravely dealt with its devastation and the later attempts to find and capture the perpetrators who inflicted this cruelty.

So when I say I am going to puke if I hear one more report about Boston that talks of “heroes” and attempts to paint the city as suffering untold trauma, I am not being critical of real heroes or true and essential mournful feelings by those who were there.  I simply want the media circus to quit doing stupid interviews that ask inane questions with obvious answers about how people felt and over dramatizing how the city will struggle to recover from the shock of it all.

Most of us have experienced fear and panic at some level where we can identify with those present at the Boston Marathon and the emotions they surely felt.  Yet reporters barely give anyone time to assimilate what just happened to them before they pounce on them, hoping to get “an exclusive” that will set them apart from others doing much the same thing.  There’s nothing exclusive that’ll come from getting in the faces of dazed and frightened people expected to inform a concerned public.

I detest too how flippantly the term “hero” is thrown out there by the media to portray people who reacted to meet the victims needs after a tragic event rather than flee for their own safety.  At any given time some people have a gut instinct to react in this manner simply because the threat of danger is not that obvious to them at the time.  Relatives and close friends are likely to react this way naturally.  Someone who is close to them has been hurt.

charles-barsotti-some-of-us-are-unsung-heroes-new-yorker-cartoon

In any similar situation though at another time some may not act so “heroically” and instead revert to the other half of the “fight or flight” response built into our DNA.  Such reactions are instantaneous and not rationally explored under such rapidly evolving circumstances.  Running for your life is a not an unheroic act by default.  It’s natural.  The real hero is the one who understands the danger confronting them and proceeds in harm’s way anyway.

What are these people thinking of?

Nothing makes me cringe more when I watch a reporter look woefully at their non-heroic prey and ask a question that only a moron would ask someone who nearly lost their life and escaped bodily harm.  “What were you thinking when that happened?” or “How did that make you feel?”

I think we can all understand how survival instincts would kick in under such conditions and the natural response of fear overwhelming us.  But reporters are looking for something deeper from their interviewee to provide them and us insight into the tragedy that happened.  Something that is simply not going to occur while people are still in shock or even days later with a camera and lights in their face and with a stranger they really don’t know well enough to empty themselves of their innermost feelings that have not become apparent even to them yet.

So we all have to suffer through those 60 second spots where interviewees struggle to respond to such obviously stupid inquiries.  They haven’t yet been able to peel back the layers that hide such trauma but here they are anyway, being asked to give the reporter something more than they are capable of providing.

When they attempt to reach down in that well of darkness to recall the events of that day, words are not forthcoming but genuine emotions can be.  And that’s when the camera zooms in on them.  The reporter is eagerly waiting for that tremor in their voice and the tears to start running from eyes of painful faces.  There’s the extreme closeup and the silence as an inevitable emotion rises to the surface.

You can almost hear the reporter say to themselves as it happens,  “There it is.  That’s what I came for.”  These may be genuine human responses but they don’t speak to the depth of their causes.  That requires time and time is the enemy of the reporter that has to present something almost instantaneously for the 24-7 news cycle we now live with.

Have you no sense of decency at all?

And then there are those interviews with people who had some association with the perpetrators.  These are the ones I can’t get to the TV remote control quick enough to change the channel from.  Those interviews with family members or lovers will always convey shock and doubt that “such a quite and kind boy would do such a thing.”  Clearly people close to the one who they thought they knew intimately are in disbelief that they had a dark side to them.  It’s got to be a little unnerving to realize that someone who just murdered numerous people could have displayed such warmth and kindness in their presence.

Why they even allow the vulcher reporters into their homes to probe as they do is beyond me.  I feel like a voyeur invading the personal space of someone who is grieving and experienced unexpected shock at a time when privacy is what they really want.   Such interviews may be the result of a cunning reporter trying to convince the families that  “telling their story” will have a cathartic effect and “show a human side to an otherwise disturbed individual”.

Let’s face it.  Such opportunities demand that reporters do what they need to do to get that human reaction for their audience, even if it is manipulated through conniving efforts.  They are after all in competition with other news sources who struggle to maintain market share of viewer audiences.  It was in such haste that CNN, FOX news, and the New York Post reporters falsely conveyed information about the Boston Marathon bombing suspects. 

April 19, 2013

When it comes to the lone gunman who goes on a killing spree however, reporters will seldom find anyone who knows them intimately enough to extract the intricacies of their psyche.  Those who had any relationship that lasted more than a month will often state how it never dawned on them that they would kill anyone but those who barely knew the killer “always suspected they were capable of going off like this.”  But likely all the reporter is looking for is the anger many of us feel at such senseless slaughter and hopes that one of these people will dramatically display this for them on camera.  Why would that be considered newsworthy?

These interviews try to reveal a side of the killers that meet our expectations of evil characters found in the latest crime thriller novel, movie or TV drama.  Few if any of the people in real life who get approached by the media really knew the perpetrator well enough to understand what made them do what they did.  They’re a waste of our time unless of course you’re looking for the pat answers that address some preconceived notions about such people.  Many think they have a set of skills that allows them to understand why these highly disturbed people act out the way they do and its all been based on their devotion to John Grisham novels or years of watching Law and Order each season on TV.

Oh how I miss real journalism!

Like anyone else I am horrified when such tragedies occur, though I must confess I am becoming less emotionally responsive by the sheer number that are presented to us in our homes via the media.  I want answers because such seemingly unwarranted violence doesn’t register with me most times.  Why does the man who delivered my mail, fixed my car or did my taxes all of sudden flip out and go on a killing spree?  Why does the little boy who likely grew up in a relatively secure environment and had dreams like most of us develop into a madman a few years later and purchase a small arsenal with the intent of killing as many people as he can?

I want answers but I don’t want them to come cheaply.  I don’t want them to come from someone who’s not ready to divulge what they really know nor do I want them from someone who barely knew the killer but jumps at the opportunity to get their 15 minutes of fame in when an eager reporter is looking for his or her own “exclusive” that will benefit their career down the road.

I want someone who has done the due diligence and explored every facet of the crime, their victims and those who knew them as closely as anyone can.  I want the results to resemble something along the lines of Truman Capote’s In Cold Blood that leaves no doubt why one human being takes the innocent life of another.  I may be impatient but that doesn’t allow some cheesy “news” reporter to exploit that weakness.  Truth about such complex human behaviors is not going to be found in a quickie interview of some individual either too traumatized to make a valid and complete assessment or one who really has no better knowledge of the why and hows but was simply in the wrong place at the right time.

Media-Disaster

The media has already lost credibility in my eyes because they consistently miss the really important issues by choosing instead to cater to the whims of a public who would rather be entertained than informed.  Corporate ownership of most news sources today also has weakened the journalistic credibility that once made the 4th estate the one institution that the public could rely on to counter the power of wealthy special interests.

So when tragic events like the Boston Marathon and 911 occur, as well as those at Tucson, Aurora, and Virginia Tech, I don’t want to be used as a means to improve ratings and increase the profits of insensitive entities who exploit a genuine human desire to get at the truth.  I don’t want to be insulted or embarrassed when I turn on the news and if I want to be entertained I’ll turn to those sources that are designed for that.

If trying to fill every minute of air time with inane chatter and rushed reporting is part of what newscasters feel is essential today in a major breaking story with such great tragic consequences, then don’t expect me to waste my time that could be better spent doing something meaningful.



Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 81 other followers